XLSR vs. QQQ
XLSR (SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLSR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by State Street, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. XLSR is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLSR returned 10.06%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLSR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
XLSR vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLSR achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
XLSR
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 6.52%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- 17.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
XLSR vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLSR SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF | 6.52% | 17.34% | 17.60% | 18.95% | -15.70% | 20.47% | 20.23% | 14.13% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 16.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLSR and QQQ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between XLSR and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLSR vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLSR
QQQ
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XLSR
QQQ
Healthcare
XLSR
QQQ
Communication Services
XLSR
QQQ
Industrials
XLSR
QQQ
Energy
XLSR
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
XLSR
QQQ
Financial Services
XLSR
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
XLSR
QQQ
Basic Materials
XLSR
-
QQQ
Real Estate
XLSR
-
QQQ
Utilities
XLSR
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLSR vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
XLSR
QQQ
XLSR vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLSR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.45 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 3.51 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.44 | 13.49 | -3.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLSR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.64 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.81 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.41 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
XLSR vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLSR drawdown since its inception was -32.94%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSR and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLSR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.94% | -82.97% | +50.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -11.96% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.57% | -22.77% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.32% | -35.12% | +11.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.26% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.33% | -32.79% | +27.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 3.11% | -0.63% |
Volatility
XLSR vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) is 2.97%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that XLSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLSR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 4.49% | -1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.23% | 12.10% | -2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.26% | 15.94% | -3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 22.38% | -5.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 22.29% | -2.25% |
XLSR vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLSR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLSR vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
XLSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
XLSR SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF | 0.52% | 0.58% | 0.66% | 1.04% | 1.80% | 3.44% | 1.25% | 0.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, XLSR and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to XLSR (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLSR dropped -32.94% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.97% vs 10.06% for XLSR. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, XLSR has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.97% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for XLSR.
XLSR has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
XLSR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for XLSR and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLSR and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer