XLSI vs. CHPS
XLSI (Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLSI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. XLSI is actively managed, while CHPS is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. XLSI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
XLSI vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLSI achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 78.69% return.
XLSI
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS
- 1D
- -5.25%
- 1M
- -12.71%
- 6M
- 57.64%
- YTD
- 78.69%
- 1Y
- 137.41%
- 3Y*
- 49.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLSI vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.55% | -1.06% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 78.69% | 35.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLSI and CHPS is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | -0.23 |
XLSI vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLSI
CHPS
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLSI
CHPS
Basic Materials
XLSI
-
CHPS
-
Communication Services
XLSI
-
CHPS
Consumer Cyclical
XLSI
-
CHPS
Consumer Defensive
XLSI
-
CHPS
Energy
XLSI
-
CHPS
Healthcare
XLSI
-
CHPS
-
Industrials
XLSI
-
CHPS
Real Estate
XLSI
-
CHPS
-
Technology
XLSI
-
CHPS
Utilities
XLSI
-
CHPS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLSI vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
XLSI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CHPS
XLSI vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLSI | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.42 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 23.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLSI vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLSI | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -39.44% | +31.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.04% | -21.52% | +19.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -9.15% | +5.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.82% | — |
Volatility
XLSI vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLSI | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 21.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 38.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.21% | 43.24% | -32.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.21% | 36.55% | -25.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.21% | 36.55% | -25.34% |
XLSI vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLSI vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.91%, more than CHPS's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.36% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% |
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.91% | 5.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLSI and CHPS have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLSI.
XLSI has the higher dividend yield at 11.91%, compared with 0.36% for CHPS.
XLSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while CHPS is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.15% for CHPS.
Find the right allocation for XLSI and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer