PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLSI vs. ARMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLSI vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLSI achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 363.23% return.


XLSI

1D
0.33%
1M
-1.28%
YTD
1.78%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMW

1D
3.44%
1M
128.75%
YTD
363.23%
6M
245.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLSI vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLSI and ARMW is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

-0.09

XLSI vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLSI
ARMW

Financial Services

100.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

36.0%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

XLSI
100.1%
ARMW

-

Basic Materials

XLSI

-

ARMW

-

Communication Services

XLSI

-

ARMW

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLSI

-

ARMW

-

Consumer Defensive

XLSI

-

ARMW

-

Energy

XLSI

-

ARMW

-

Healthcare

XLSI

-

ARMW

-

Industrials

XLSI

-

ARMW

-

Real Estate

XLSI

-

ARMW

-

Technology

XLSI

-

ARMW
36.0%

Utilities

XLSI

-

ARMW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLSI vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XLSI vs. ARMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLSIARMWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

4.96

-4.79

Drawdowns

XLSI vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and ARMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLSIARMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-48.47%

+40.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.43%

0.00%

-6.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-26.55%

+23.34%

Volatility

XLSI vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLSIARMWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.44%

88.46%

-78.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.44%

88.46%

-78.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.44%

88.46%

-78.02%

XLSI vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLSI vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.76%, less than ARMW's 15.20% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XLSI and ARMW have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLSI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLSI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 10.76% for XLSI.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.99% for ARMW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLSI and ARMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer