XLSI vs. ARMW
XLSI (Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. XLSI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
XLSI vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLSI achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 363.23% return.
XLSI
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMW
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- 128.75%
- YTD
- 363.23%
- 6M
- 245.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLSI vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 1.78% | -0.45% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 363.23% | -40.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLSI and ARMW is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | -0.09 |
XLSI vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLSI
ARMW
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLSI
ARMW
-
Basic Materials
XLSI
-
ARMW
-
Communication Services
XLSI
-
ARMW
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLSI
-
ARMW
-
Consumer Defensive
XLSI
-
ARMW
-
Energy
XLSI
-
ARMW
-
Healthcare
XLSI
-
ARMW
-
Industrials
XLSI
-
ARMW
-
Real Estate
XLSI
-
ARMW
-
Technology
XLSI
-
ARMW
Utilities
XLSI
-
ARMW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLSI vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLSI | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 4.96 | -4.79 |
Drawdowns
XLSI vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLSI | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -48.47% | +40.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.43% | 0.00% | -6.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -26.55% | +23.34% |
Volatility
XLSI vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLSI | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.44% | 88.46% | -78.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 88.46% | -78.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 88.46% | -78.02% |
XLSI vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLSI vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.76%, less than ARMW's 15.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 15.20% | 16.38% |
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 10.76% | 5.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLSI and ARMW have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLSI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLSI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 10.76% for XLSI.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for XLSI and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer