XLRI vs. KBUF
XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and KBUF (KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while KBUF is a Options Trading fund actively managed by KraneShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLRI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KBUF.
Performance
XLRI vs. KBUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLRI achieves a 4.25% return, which is significantly higher than KBUF's -14.30% return.
XLRI
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 4.25%
- 6M
- 5.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KBUF
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- -14.30%
- 6M
- -13.98%
- 1Y
- -7.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLRI vs. KBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 4.25% | -0.57% |
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | -14.30% | 5.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLRI and KBUF is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLRI vs. KBUF — Risk / Return Rank
XLRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KBUF
XLRI vs. KBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI) and KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLRI | KBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.91 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.89 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLRI vs. KBUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLRI drawdown since its inception was -7.12%, smaller than the maximum KBUF drawdown of -19.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLRI and KBUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLRI | KBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -19.54% | +12.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.84% | -19.36% | +16.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -4.41% | +2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.39% | — |
Volatility
XLRI vs. KBUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLRI | KBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.90% | 13.14% | -2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.90% | 14.29% | -3.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.90% | 14.29% | -3.39% |
XLRI vs. KBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLRI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KBUF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLRI vs. KBUF - Dividend Comparison
XLRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.52%, more than KBUF's 8.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | 8.77% | 7.51% | 3.53% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 12.52% | 6.85% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLRI and KBUF have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KBUF.
XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 12.52%, compared with 8.77% for KBUF.
XLRI is categorized as Derivative Income, while KBUF is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: State Street and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLRI and 0.95% for KBUF.
Find the right allocation for XLRI and KBUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer