PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLRE vs. XLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLRE vs. XLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLRE achieves a 13.76% return, which is significantly higher than XLC's -5.99% return.


XLRE

1D
-0.07%
1M
3.96%
6M
10.88%
YTD
13.76%
1Y
11.33%
3Y*
9.06%
5Y*
3.10%
10Y*
6.28%
ALL TIME*
7.50%

XLC

1D
-0.69%
1M
0.79%
6M
-2.47%
YTD
-5.99%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
20.18%
5Y*
7.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLRE vs. XLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XLRE
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
13.76%2.63%5.09%12.36%-26.25%46.10%-2.18%28.68%0.75%
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
-5.99%23.08%34.71%52.82%-37.63%15.96%26.90%31.05%-16.45%

Correlation

The correlation between XLRE and XLC is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018

0.46

The correlation between XLRE and XLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLRE vs. XLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLRE
XLRE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XLRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XLRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

XLC
XLC Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLC Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLC Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLRE vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLREXLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.05

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

0.31

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.74

0.84

+2.90

XLRE vs. XLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the XLC Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLRE and XLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLRE vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLRE drawdown since its inception was -38.83%, smaller than the maximum XLC drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLRE and XLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLREXLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.83%

-46.65%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.33%

-11.57%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.74%

-17.97%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.12%

-46.65%

+12.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-7.84%

+7.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.50%

-10.55%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

4.22%

-1.19%

Volatility

XLRE vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) is 4.73%, while Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that XLRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLREXLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

5.32%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.10%

11.11%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

13.95%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.15%

20.79%

-1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.46%

22.13%

-1.67%

XLRE vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLRE and XLC have an expense ratio of 0.13%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLRE vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison

XLRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than XLC's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.30%1.13%0.99%0.82%1.10%0.74%0.68%0.82%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLRE
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
3.11%3.45%3.43%3.31%3.70%2.61%3.15%3.06%3.78%3.25%4.22%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLRE and XLC have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLC has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to XLRE (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLRE dropped -38.83% vs XLC's -46.65%.

On 5-year performance, XLC leads with 7.29% vs 3.10% for XLRE. Both ETFs have the same 0.13% expense ratio. On volatility, XLRE has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLC has performed better with a 7.29% return vs 3.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLRE and XLC have the same expense ratio: 0.13% per year.

XLRE has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 1.30% for XLC.

XLRE is categorized as REIT, while XLC is Communications Equities. XLRE tracks Real Estate Select Sector Index, while XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index.

XLRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLRE and XLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer