XLRE vs. ICF
XLRE (Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund) and ICF (iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - XLRE tracks the Real Estate Select Sector Index while ICF tracks the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLRE returned 6.68%/yr vs 5.54%/yr for ICF. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XLRE charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ICF.
Performance
XLRE vs. ICF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLRE achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than ICF's 12.19% return. Over the past 10 years, XLRE has outperformed ICF with an annualized return of 6.68%, while ICF has yielded a comparatively lower 5.54% annualized return.
XLRE
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 7.82%
- 1Y
- 8.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.43%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- 6.68%
ICF
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 12.19%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 11.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.12%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
XLRE vs. ICF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLRE Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund | 8.56% | 2.63% | 5.09% | 12.36% | -26.25% | 46.10% | -2.18% | 28.68% | -2.39% | 10.69% |
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 12.19% | 1.85% | 5.30% | 10.36% | -26.12% | 44.17% | -5.43% | 25.48% | -2.55% | 4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLRE and ICF is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2015 | 0.97 |
The correlation between XLRE and ICF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLRE vs. ICF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLRE
ICF
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
XLRE
ICF
Basic Materials
XLRE
ICF
-
Communication Services
XLRE
-
ICF
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLRE
-
ICF
-
Consumer Defensive
XLRE
-
ICF
-
Energy
XLRE
-
ICF
-
Financial Services
XLRE
-
ICF
-
Healthcare
XLRE
-
ICF
-
Industrials
XLRE
-
ICF
-
Technology
XLRE
-
ICF
-
Utilities
XLRE
-
ICF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLRE vs. ICF — Risk / Return Rank
XLRE
ICF
XLRE vs. ICF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLRE | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.15 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 1.38 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | 3.92 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLRE | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 0.84 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.16 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.27 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.31 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
XLRE vs. ICF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLRE drawdown since its inception was -38.83%, smaller than the maximum ICF drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLRE and ICF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLRE | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.83% | -76.74% | +37.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -8.20% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.74% | -17.25% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.12% | -34.74% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.83% | -40.22% | +1.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -2.67% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.61% | -14.18% | +4.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 2.88% | +0.15% |
Volatility
XLRE vs. ICF - Volatility Comparison
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) and iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) have volatilities of 3.71% and 3.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLRE | ICF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 3.71% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.66% | 9.85% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.43% | 13.57% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 18.91% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 20.58% | -0.18% |
XLRE vs. ICF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLRE has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ICF's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLRE vs. ICF - Dividend Comparison
XLRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than ICF's 2.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.48% | 2.88% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.21% | 3.30% |
XLRE Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund | 3.22% | 3.45% | 3.43% | 3.31% | 3.70% | 2.61% | 3.15% | 3.06% | 3.78% | 3.25% | 4.22% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, XLRE and ICF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ICF has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to XLRE (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLRE dropped -38.83% vs ICF's -76.74%.
On 10-year performance, XLRE leads with 6.68% vs 5.54% for ICF. On fees, XLRE is cheaper at 0.13% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLRE has performed better with a 6.68% return vs 5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLRE is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ICF.
XLRE has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.48% for ICF.
XLRE tracks Real Estate Select Sector Index, while ICF tracks Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLRE and 0.34% for ICF.
ICF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLRE and ICF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer