ICF vs. REET
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET).
ICF and REET are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ICF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2001. REET is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. It was launched on Jul 8, 2014. Both ICF and REET are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ICF or REET.
Correlation
The correlation between ICF and REET is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ICF vs. REET - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ICF:
0.41
REET:
0.29
ICF:
0.66
REET:
0.48
ICF:
1.08
REET:
1.06
ICF:
0.25
REET:
0.17
ICF:
1.49
REET:
0.92
ICF:
4.46%
REET:
4.53%
ICF:
16.09%
REET:
14.38%
ICF:
-76.73%
REET:
-44.59%
ICF:
-14.74%
REET:
-14.63%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly higher than REET's 2.00% return. Over the past 10 years, ICF has outperformed REET with an annualized return of 5.02%, while REET has yielded a comparatively lower 3.06% annualized return.
ICF
4.57%
-5.86%
7.24%
5.69%
3.36%
5.02%
REET
2.00%
-5.43%
6.06%
3.11%
0.59%
3.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICF vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than REET's 0.14% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ICF vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ICF vs. REET - Dividend Comparison
ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than REET's 3.66% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.68% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.32% | 3.30% | 3.00% | 3.41% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.66% | 3.27% | 2.42% | 3.18% | 2.64% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% | 2.12% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ICF vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.73%, which is greater than REET's maximum drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and REET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ICF vs. REET - Volatility Comparison
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) at 5.06%. This indicates that ICF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.