XLP vs. VWRD.L
XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) and VWRD.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while VWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLP returned 7.60%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for VWRD.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLP charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VWRD.L.
Performance
XLP vs. VWRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly higher than VWRD.L's 10.27% return. Over the past 10 years, XLP has underperformed VWRD.L with an annualized return of 7.60%, while VWRD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.94% annualized return.
XLP
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
VWRD.L
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 25.73%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
XLP vs. VWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 11.10% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
VWRD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 10.27% | 22.39% | 17.65% | 22.31% | -18.19% | 18.52% | 16.13% | 25.67% | -9.70% | 24.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLP and VWRD.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLP and VWRD.L has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLP vs. VWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLP
VWRD.L
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
XLP
VWRD.L
Consumer Cyclical
XLP
VWRD.L
Basic Materials
XLP
-
VWRD.L
Communication Services
XLP
-
VWRD.L
Energy
XLP
-
VWRD.L
Financial Services
XLP
-
VWRD.L
Healthcare
XLP
-
VWRD.L
Industrials
XLP
-
VWRD.L
Real Estate
XLP
-
VWRD.L
Technology
XLP
-
VWRD.L
Utilities
XLP
-
VWRD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLP vs. VWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLP
VWRD.L
XLP vs. VWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLP | VWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.37 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 2.91 | -2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.52 | 11.88 | -10.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLP vs. VWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, which is greater than VWRD.L's maximum drawdown of -33.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and VWRD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLP | VWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -33.83% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | -8.80% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | -16.25% | +3.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.30% | -26.02% | +9.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.51% | -33.83% | +9.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.12% | -1.99% | -2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -4.51% | -2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.01% | 2.16% | +2.85% |
Volatility
XLP vs. VWRD.L - Volatility Comparison
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) have volatilities of 4.53% and 4.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLP | VWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 4.40% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 10.29% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.90% | 12.77% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.34% | 15.38% | -2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 15.73% | -0.98% |
XLP vs. VWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRD.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLP vs. VWRD.L - Dividend Comparison
XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than VWRD.L's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWRD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 1.25% | 1.38% | 1.52% | 1.69% | 2.05% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.88% | 2.29% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 2.07% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.53% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLP and VWRD.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRD.L.
XLP is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while VWRD.L is Global Equities. XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLP and 0.22% for VWRD.L.
Find the right allocation for XLP and VWRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer