XLP vs. SCHX
XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLP returned 7.60%/yr vs 15.35%/yr for SCHX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLP charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
XLP vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 8.86% return. Over the past 10 years, XLP has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 7.60%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.35% annualized return.
XLP
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 25.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
XLP vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 11.10% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 8.86% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLP and SCHX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLP and SCHX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLP vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLP
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
XLP
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
XLP
SCHX
Basic Materials
XLP
-
SCHX
Communication Services
XLP
-
SCHX
Energy
XLP
-
SCHX
Financial Services
XLP
-
SCHX
Healthcare
XLP
-
SCHX
Industrials
XLP
-
SCHX
Real Estate
XLP
-
SCHX
Technology
XLP
-
SCHX
Utilities
XLP
-
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLP vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
XLP
SCHX
XLP vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLP | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.34 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 2.63 | -1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.52 | 11.65 | -10.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLP vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLP | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -34.33% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | -9.02% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | -19.04% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.30% | -25.41% | +9.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.51% | -34.33% | +9.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.12% | -2.37% | -1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -3.96% | -3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.01% | 2.04% | +2.97% |
Volatility
XLP vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) have volatilities of 4.53% and 4.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLP | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 4.47% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 9.71% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.90% | 12.47% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.34% | 17.19% | -3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 18.17% | -3.42% |
XLP vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLP vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than SCHX's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.53% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLP and SCHX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLP has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to SCHX (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLP dropped -35.90% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 15.35% vs 7.60% for XLP. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLP.
XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.02% for SCHX.
XLP is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLP and 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLP and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer