PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLP vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLP vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 8.86% return. Over the past 10 years, XLP has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 7.60%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.35% annualized return.


XLP

1D
0.65%
1M
0.99%
YTD
11.10%
6M
9.54%
1Y
8.93%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
7.60%

SCHX

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.68%
YTD
8.86%
6M
9.10%
1Y
25.11%
3Y*
20.84%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLP vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
11.10%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
8.86%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%31.22%-4.66%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between XLP and SCHX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between XLP and SCHX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLP vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLP
SCHX

Consumer Defensive

99.0%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
9.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Communication Services

-

11.7%

Energy

-

3.0%

Financial Services

-

9.0%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

6.4%

Real Estate

-

0.9%

Technology

-

42.9%

Utilities

-

1.3%

Consumer Defensive

XLP
99.0%
SCHX
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XLP
1.0%
SCHX
9.3%

Basic Materials

XLP

-

SCHX
1.0%

Communication Services

XLP

-

SCHX
11.7%

Energy

XLP

-

SCHX
3.0%

Financial Services

XLP

-

SCHX
9.0%

Healthcare

XLP

-

SCHX
8.5%

Industrials

XLP

-

SCHX
6.4%

Real Estate

XLP

-

SCHX
0.9%

Technology

XLP

-

SCHX
42.9%

Utilities

XLP

-

SCHX
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLP vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLP vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLPSCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.34

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

2.63

-1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.52

11.65

-10.13

XLP vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLP and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLP vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLPSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.90%

-34.33%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-9.02%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.39%

-19.04%

+6.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.30%

-25.41%

+9.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.51%

-34.33%

+9.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-2.37%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-3.96%

-3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

2.04%

+2.97%

Volatility

XLP vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) have volatilities of 4.53% and 4.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLPSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

4.47%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

9.71%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.90%

12.47%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.34%

17.19%

-3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

18.17%

-3.42%

XLP vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLP vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than SCHX's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.02%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.53%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLP and SCHX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLP has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to SCHX (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLP dropped -35.90% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 15.35% vs 7.60% for XLP. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLP.

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.02% for SCHX.

XLP is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLP and 0.03% for SCHX.

SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLP and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer