PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLP vs. SCHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLP vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 21.09% return. Over the past 10 years, XLP has underperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 7.58%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.39% annualized return.


XLP

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.98%
YTD
10.39%
6M
9.69%
1Y
7.55%
3Y*
8.18%
5Y*
6.52%
10Y*
7.58%

SCHA

1D
3.42%
1M
4.11%
YTD
21.09%
6M
16.82%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
11.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLP vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
10.39%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
21.09%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between XLP and SCHA is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between XLP and SCHA has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLP vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLP
SCHA

Consumer Defensive

99.0%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
9.0%

Basic Materials

-

4.4%

Communication Services

-

2.3%

Energy

-

5.4%

Financial Services

-

15.3%

Healthcare

-

13.2%

Industrials

-

15.6%

Real Estate

-

5.9%

Technology

-

23.9%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Consumer Defensive

XLP
99.0%
SCHA
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XLP
1.0%
SCHA
9.0%

Basic Materials

XLP

-

SCHA
4.4%

Communication Services

XLP

-

SCHA
2.3%

Energy

XLP

-

SCHA
5.4%

Financial Services

XLP

-

SCHA
15.3%

Healthcare

XLP

-

SCHA
13.2%

Industrials

XLP

-

SCHA
15.6%

Real Estate

XLP

-

SCHA
5.9%

Technology

XLP

-

SCHA
23.9%

Utilities

XLP

-

SCHA
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLP vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLP vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLPSCHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.36

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

4.17

-3.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

15.27

-13.76

XLP vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLP and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLP vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and SCHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLPSCHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.90%

-42.41%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-9.50%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.39%

-27.29%

+14.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.30%

-30.79%

+14.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.51%

-42.41%

+17.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.73%

0.00%

-4.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-7.57%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.00%

2.59%

+2.41%

Volatility

XLP vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) is 4.50%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that XLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLPSCHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

6.55%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

13.72%

-3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

18.60%

-5.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.34%

22.03%

-8.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

22.75%

-8.00%

XLP vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLP vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than SCHA's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
0.99%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.55%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLP and SCHA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHA has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to XLP (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLP dropped -35.90% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

On 10-year performance, SCHA leads with 11.39% vs 7.58% for XLP. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 11.39% return vs 7.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLP.

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 0.99% for SCHA.

XLP is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SCHA is Small Cap Blend Equities. XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLP and 0.04% for SCHA.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLP and SCHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer