XLP vs. RSPS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) and RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - XLP tracks the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index while RSPS tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLP returned 7.60%/yr vs 4.58%/yr for RSPS. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLP charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPS.

Performance

XLP vs. RSPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly higher than RSPS's 6.03% return. Over the past 10 years, XLP has outperformed RSPS with an annualized return of 7.60%, while RSPS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.58% annualized return.

XLP

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 10.07%
• 6M: 9.45%
• 1Y: 6.70%
• 3Y*: 7.48%
• 5Y*: 6.70%
• 10Y*: 7.60%

RSPS

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 1.68%
• YTD: 6.03%
• 6M: 5.43%
• 1Y: 3.68%
• 3Y*: -0.40%
• 5Y*: 1.52%
• 10Y*: 4.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLP vs. RSPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	10.07%	1.52%	12.20%	-0.82%	-0.81%	17.20%	10.11%	27.43%	-8.07%	12.98%
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	6.03%	-0.88%	-1.47%	-5.39%	2.88%	14.68%	6.19%	28.17%	-10.86%	14.20%

Correlation

The correlation between XLP and RSPS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006	0.85

The correlation between XLP and RSPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLP vs. RSPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLP	RSPS
Consumer Defensive	99.0%	97.1%
Consumer Cyclical	1.0%	2.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLP vs. RSPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLP

XLP Risk / Return Rank: 16
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 15
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 15

RSPS

RSPS Risk / Return Rank: 12
RSPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
RSPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
RSPS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
RSPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
RSPS Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLP vs. RSPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLP	RSPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.51	0.26	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.82	0.47	+0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.05	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	0.32	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.32	0.57	+0.75

XLP vs. RSPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the RSPS Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLP and RSPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLP vs. RSPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, roughly equal to the maximum RSPS drawdown of -35.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and RSPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLP	RSPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.90%	-35.93%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.69%	-11.72%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.39%	-16.53%	+4.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.30%	-18.61%	+2.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.51%	-25.42%	+0.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.01%	-7.43%	+2.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.06%	-5.06%	-2.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.10%	6.45%	-1.35%

Volatility

XLP vs. RSPS - Volatility Comparison

State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) have volatilities of 5.20% and 5.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLP	RSPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	5.44%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.54%	10.96%	-0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.11%	14.08%	-0.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.37%	13.71%	-0.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.77%	14.92%	-0.15%

XLP vs. RSPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPS's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLP vs. RSPS - Dividend Comparison

XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than RSPS's 2.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	2.93%	2.82%	2.86%	2.78%	2.31%	2.07%	2.14%	2.12%	2.43%	1.90%	1.76%	1.77%
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.60%	2.75%	2.77%	2.63%	2.47%	2.28%	2.50%	2.57%	3.04%	2.62%	2.53%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLP and RSPS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, XLP and RSPS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XLP or RSPS?

RSPS has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to XLP (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLP dropped -35.90% vs RSPS's -35.93%.

Which ETF is better, XLP or RSPS?

On 10-year performance, XLP leads with 7.60% vs 4.58% for RSPS. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLP or RSPS?

Over the 10-year period, XLP has performed better with a 7.60% return vs 4.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLP or RSPS?

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLP or RSPS?

RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 2.60% for XLP.

What is the main difference between XLP and RSPS?

XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLP and 0.40% for RSPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.