XLP vs. IEMG

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLP returned 7.60%/yr vs 10.42%/yr for IEMG. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLP charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.

Performance

XLP vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 22.84% return. Over the past 10 years, XLP has underperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 7.60%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.42% annualized return.

XLP

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 11.10%
• 6M: 9.54%
• 1Y: 8.93%
• 3Y*: 8.26%
• 5Y*: 6.65%
• 10Y*: 7.60%

IEMG

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 22.84%
• 6M: 25.59%
• 1Y: 44.83%
• 3Y*: 21.33%
• 5Y*: 7.15%
• 10Y*: 10.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLP vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	11.10%	1.52%	12.20%	-0.82%	-0.81%	17.20%	10.11%	27.43%	-8.07%	12.98%
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	22.84%	32.56%	6.50%	11.52%	-19.98%	-0.64%	17.87%	17.81%	-14.92%	37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between XLP and IEMG is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012	0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between XLP and IEMG has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLP vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLP	IEMG
Consumer Defensive	99.0%	3.3%
Consumer Cyclical	1.0%	9.5%
Basic Materials	-	6.9%
Communication Services	-	6.4%
Energy	-	3.8%
Financial Services	-	18.4%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Industrials	-	9.0%
Real Estate	-	1.7%
Technology	-	35.0%
Utilities	-	2.2%

Return for Risk

XLP vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLP

XLP Risk / Return Rank: 19
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 18
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 17

IEMG

IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 73
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 76
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLP vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLP	IEMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	2.03	-1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.94	2.65	-1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.39	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.79	3.23	-2.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.52	11.89	-10.37

XLP vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLP and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLP vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and IEMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLP	IEMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.90%	-38.71%	+2.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.69%	-13.21%	+3.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.39%	-17.21%	+4.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.30%	-35.75%	+19.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.51%	-38.71%	+14.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.12%	-3.98%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.06%	-12.95%	+5.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.01%	3.59%	+1.42%

Volatility

XLP vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) is 4.53%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 10.60%. This indicates that XLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLP	IEMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.53%	10.60%	-6.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.14%	18.89%	-8.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.90%	21.08%	-8.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.34%	18.73%	-5.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.75%	20.17%	-5.42%

XLP vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLP vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than IEMG's 2.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	2.24%	2.75%	3.20%	2.89%	2.71%	3.06%	1.87%	3.15%	2.76%	2.35%	2.28%	2.53%
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.53%	2.75%	2.77%	2.63%	2.47%	2.28%	2.50%	2.57%	3.04%	2.62%	2.53%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLP and IEMG in my portfolio?

XLP and IEMG have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLP or IEMG?

IEMG has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to XLP (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLP dropped -35.90% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

Which ETF is better, XLP or IEMG?

On 10-year performance, IEMG leads with 10.42% vs 7.60% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLP or IEMG?

Over the 10-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 10.42% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLP or IEMG?

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for IEMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLP or IEMG?

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 2.24% for IEMG.

What is the main difference between XLP and IEMG?

XLP is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLP and 0.09% for IEMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.