PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLP vs. FTXG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLP vs. FTXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 6.21% return, which is significantly higher than FTXG's 5.12% return.


XLP

1D
-0.15%
1M
-2.40%
YTD
6.21%
6M
6.01%
1Y
2.54%
3Y*
6.67%
5Y*
5.52%
10Y*
7.17%

FTXG

1D
-0.70%
1M
-2.70%
YTD
5.12%
6M
3.69%
1Y
-0.15%
3Y*
-3.23%
5Y*
-1.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLP vs. FTXG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
6.21%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%
FTXG
First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF
5.12%-6.52%-2.52%-6.48%6.15%13.48%6.63%23.97%-12.09%5.64%

Correlation

The correlation between XLP and FTXG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016

0.64

The correlation between XLP and FTXG shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.83 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLP vs. FTXG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLP
FTXG

Consumer Defensive

99.0%
94.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

4.3%

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

1.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

XLP
99.0%
FTXG
94.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XLP
1.0%
FTXG

-

Basic Materials

XLP

-

FTXG
4.3%

Communication Services

XLP

-

FTXG

-

Energy

XLP

-

FTXG

-

Financial Services

XLP

-

FTXG

-

Healthcare

XLP

-

FTXG

-

Industrials

XLP

-

FTXG
1.7%

Real Estate

XLP

-

FTXG

-

Technology

XLP

-

FTXG

-

Utilities

XLP

-

FTXG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLP vs. FTXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

FTXG
FTXG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FTXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXG Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXG Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLP vs. FTXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLPFTXGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.01

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

-0.01

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.52

-0.03

+0.54

XLP vs. FTXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the FTXG Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLP and FTXG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLPFTXGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

-0.01

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

-0.11

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.18

+0.25

Drawdowns

XLP vs. FTXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, which is greater than FTXG's maximum drawdown of -31.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and FTXG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLPFTXGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.90%

-31.52%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-10.14%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.39%

-18.10%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.30%

-21.68%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.34%

-15.36%

+7.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-7.64%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.94%

5.42%

-0.48%

Volatility

XLP vs. FTXG - Volatility Comparison

State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) at 3.09%. This indicates that XLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLPFTXGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

3.09%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.84%

9.58%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

13.61%

-0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.29%

14.46%

-1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.73%

16.63%

-1.90%

XLP vs. FTXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXG's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLP vs. FTXG - Dividend Comparison

XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than FTXG's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTXG
First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF
2.77%2.93%2.75%4.27%1.50%1.52%1.35%1.25%1.37%1.56%0.30%0.00%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.65%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLP and FTXG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLP has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to FTXG (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLP dropped -35.90% vs FTXG's -31.52%.

On 5-year performance, XLP leads with 5.52% vs -1.59% for FTXG. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FTXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLP has performed better with a 5.52% return vs -1.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXG.

FTXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 2.65% for XLP.

XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while FTXG tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Food & Beverage Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLP and 0.60% for FTXG.

XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLP and FTXG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer