PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLM-USD vs. LTC-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XLM-USD vs. LTC-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stellar (XLM-USD) and Litecoin (LTC-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLM-USD achieves a 3.24% return, which is significantly higher than LTC-USD's -39.14% return. Over the past 10 years, XLM-USD has outperformed LTC-USD with an annualized return of 63.68%, while LTC-USD has yielded a comparatively lower 25.51% annualized return.


XLM-USD

1D
-6.81%
1M
31.58%
YTD
3.24%
6M
-19.68%
1Y
-24.06%
3Y*
31.33%
5Y*
-11.64%
10Y*
63.68%

LTC-USD

1D
-0.44%
1M
-15.03%
YTD
-39.14%
6M
-45.59%
1Y
-47.85%
3Y*
-20.86%
5Y*
-23.53%
10Y*
25.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLM-USD vs. LTC-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLM-USD
Stellar
3.24%-39.55%157.40%81.66%-73.35%108.68%184.76%-60.36%-68.37%14,396.90%
LTC-USD
Litecoin
-39.14%-25.56%41.56%3.88%-52.04%17.47%202.70%38.01%-86.89%5,110.32%

Correlation

The correlation between XLM-USD and LTC-USD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2014

0.57

The correlation between XLM-USD and LTC-USD shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLM-USD vs. LTC-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLM-USD
XLM-USD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

LTC-USD
LTC-USD Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LTC-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTC-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTC-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LTC-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTC-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLM-USD vs. LTC-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stellar (XLM-USD) and Litecoin (LTC-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLM-USDLTC-USDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.28

-0.75

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.14

-0.95

+1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.90

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

-0.74

+0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.49

-1.20

+0.71

XLM-USD vs. LTC-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is higher than the LTC-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLM-USD and LTC-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLM-USDLTC-USDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

-0.75

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

-0.30

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.25

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.19

+0.14

Drawdowns

XLM-USD vs. LTC-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLM-USD drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, roughly equal to the maximum LTC-USD drawdown of -97.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLM-USD and LTC-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLM-USDLTC-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.21%

-97.59%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.19%

-64.33%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.37%

-65.94%

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.25%

-84.45%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.21%

-93.64%

-2.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.50%

-87.97%

+11.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.13%

-75.63%

+3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.44%

45.62%

+3.82%

Volatility

XLM-USD vs. LTC-USD - Volatility Comparison

Stellar (XLM-USD) has a higher volatility of 43.26% compared to Litecoin (LTC-USD) at 12.34%. This indicates that XLM-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTC-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLM-USDLTC-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.26%

12.34%

+30.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.38%

35.87%

+23.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.60%

53.08%

+17.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.98%

64.70%

+10.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

112.83%

85.62%

+27.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLM-USD and LTC-USD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLM-USD has higher volatility (43.26%) compared to LTC-USD (12.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLM-USD dropped -96.21% vs LTC-USD's -97.59%.

XLM-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLM-USD and LTC-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer