XLM-USD vs. BRK-B
XLM-USD (Stellar) is a cryptocurrency, while BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLM-USD returned 60.23%/yr vs 13.22%/yr for BRK-B. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLM-USD vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLM-USD achieves a -6.87% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-B's -2.67% return. Over the past 10 years, XLM-USD has outperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 60.23%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively lower 13.22% annualized return.
XLM-USD
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 15.17%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -21.39%
- 1Y
- -28.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.09%
- 5Y*
- -11.45%
- 10Y*
- 60.23%
BRK-B
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- -2.67%
- 6M
- -2.06%
- 1Y
- 0.35%
- 3Y*
- 13.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.22%
XLM-USD vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLM-USD Stellar | -6.87% | -39.55% | 157.40% | 81.66% | -73.35% | 108.68% | 184.76% | -60.36% | -68.37% | 14,396.90% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -2.67% | 10.89% | 27.09% | 15.46% | 3.31% | 28.95% | 2.37% | 10.93% | 3.01% | 21.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLM-USD and BRK-B is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2014 | 0.08 |
The correlation between XLM-USD and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.10 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLM-USD vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
XLM-USD
BRK-B
XLM-USD vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stellar (XLM-USD) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLM-USD | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.01 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | -0.02 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | -0.05 | -0.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLM-USD vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLM-USD drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLM-USD and BRK-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLM-USD | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.21% | -53.86% | -42.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.19% | -9.42% | -61.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.37% | -14.95% | -59.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.25% | -26.58% | -56.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.21% | -29.57% | -66.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.80% | -9.36% | -69.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.14% | -11.07% | -61.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.48% | 4.53% | +45.95% |
Volatility
XLM-USD vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
Stellar (XLM-USD) has a higher volatility of 43.48% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.95%. This indicates that XLM-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLM-USD | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 43.48% | 3.95% | +39.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.28% | 10.78% | +48.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.60% | 14.38% | +56.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.72% | 17.12% | +57.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 112.79% | 19.44% | +93.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLM-USD and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLM-USD has higher volatility (43.48%) compared to BRK-B (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLM-USD dropped -96.21% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.
BRK-B currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLM-USD and BRK-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer