PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLM-USD vs. ADBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XLM-USD vs. ADBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stellar (XLM-USD) and Adobe Inc (ADBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLM-USD achieves a -6.87% return, which is significantly higher than ADBE's -41.71% return. Over the past 10 years, XLM-USD has outperformed ADBE with an annualized return of 60.23%, while ADBE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.72% annualized return.


XLM-USD

1D
-1.52%
1M
15.17%
YTD
-6.87%
6M
-21.39%
1Y
-28.35%
3Y*
33.09%
5Y*
-11.45%
10Y*
60.23%

ADBE

1D
-6.76%
1M
-13.92%
YTD
-41.71%
6M
-42.76%
1Y
-47.91%
3Y*
-24.76%
5Y*
-17.73%
10Y*
7.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLM-USD vs. ADBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLM-USD
Stellar
-6.87%-39.55%157.40%81.66%-73.35%108.68%184.76%-60.36%-68.37%14,396.90%
ADBE
Adobe Inc
-41.71%-21.29%-25.46%77.28%-40.65%13.38%51.64%45.78%29.10%70.22%

Correlation

The correlation between XLM-USD and ADBE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2014

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLM-USD vs. ADBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLM-USD
XLM-USD Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ADBE
ADBE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ADBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADBE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ADBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADBE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLM-USD vs. ADBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stellar (XLM-USD) and Adobe Inc (ADBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLM-USDADBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.73

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

-1.03

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

-1.99

+1.42

XLM-USD vs. ADBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is higher than the ADBE Sharpe Ratio of -1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLM-USD and ADBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLM-USD vs. ADBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLM-USD drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than ADBE's maximum drawdown of -79.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLM-USD and ADBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLM-USDADBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.21%

-79.89%

-16.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.19%

-49.21%

-21.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.37%

-67.86%

-6.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.25%

-70.36%

-12.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.21%

-70.36%

-25.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.80%

-70.36%

-8.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.14%

-25.99%

-46.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

50.48%

27.31%

+23.17%

Volatility

XLM-USD vs. ADBE - Volatility Comparison

Stellar (XLM-USD) has a higher volatility of 43.48% compared to Adobe Inc (ADBE) at 16.64%. This indicates that XLM-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLM-USDADBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.48%

16.64%

+26.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.28%

29.17%

+30.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.60%

35.08%

+35.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.72%

36.54%

+38.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

112.79%

34.48%

+78.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLM-USD and ADBE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLM-USD has higher volatility (43.48%) compared to ADBE (16.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLM-USD dropped -96.21% vs ADBE's -79.89%.

XLM-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLM-USD and ADBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer