XLM-USD vs. 0700.HK
XLM-USD (Stellar) is a cryptocurrency, while 0700.HK (Tencent Holdings Ltd) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLM-USD returned 60.23%/yr vs 12.07%/yr for 0700.HK. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLM-USD vs. 0700.HK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLM-USD is traded in USD, while 0700.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 0700.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLM-USD achieves a -6.87% return, which is significantly higher than 0700.HK's -22.23% return. Over the past 10 years, XLM-USD has outperformed 0700.HK with an annualized return of 60.23%, while 0700.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 12.07% annualized return.
XLM-USD
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 15.17%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -21.39%
- 1Y
- -28.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.09%
- 5Y*
- -11.45%
- 10Y*
- 60.23%
0700.HK
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- -22.23%
- 6M
- -24.36%
- 1Y
- -7.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.43%
- 5Y*
- -2.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
XLM-USD vs. 0700.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLM-USD Stellar | -6.87% | -39.55% | 157.40% | 81.66% | -73.35% | 108.68% | 184.76% | -60.36% | -68.37% | 14,396.90% |
0700.HK Tencent Holdings Ltd | -22.23% | 44.65% | 43.98% | -6.78% | -24.42% | -19.22% | 51.36% | 20.60% | -22.66% | 112.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLM-USD and 0700.HK is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2014 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLM-USD vs. 0700.HK — Risk / Return Rank
XLM-USD
0700.HK
XLM-USD vs. 0700.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stellar (XLM-USD) and Tencent Holdings Ltd (0700.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLM-USD | 0700.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.98 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | -0.22 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | -0.47 | -0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLM-USD vs. 0700.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLM-USD drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than 0700.HK's maximum drawdown of -73.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLM-USD and 0700.HK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLM-USD | 0700.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.21% | -73.13% | -23.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.19% | -36.95% | -34.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.37% | -36.95% | -37.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.25% | -65.90% | -17.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.21% | -73.13% | -23.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.80% | -32.18% | -46.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.14% | -19.68% | -52.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.48% | 16.80% | +33.68% |
Volatility
XLM-USD vs. 0700.HK - Volatility Comparison
Stellar (XLM-USD) has a higher volatility of 43.48% compared to Tencent Holdings Ltd (0700.HK) at 13.13%. This indicates that XLM-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0700.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLM-USD | 0700.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 43.48% | 13.13% | +30.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.28% | 23.71% | +35.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.60% | 29.65% | +40.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.72% | 39.33% | +35.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 112.79% | 35.57% | +77.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLM-USD and 0700.HK have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for XLM-USD and 0700.HK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer