XLKQ.L vs. SSLN.L
XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) and SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L returned 26.55%/yr vs 14.83%/yr for SSLN.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLKQ.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SSLN.L.
Performance
XLKQ.L vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLKQ.L achieves a 18.20% return, which is significantly higher than SSLN.L's -5.21% return. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L has outperformed SSLN.L with an annualized return of 26.55%, while SSLN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 14.83% annualized return.
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 18.20%
- 6M
- 18.52%
- 1Y
- 46.40%
- 3Y*
- 30.77%
- 5Y*
- 25.01%
- 10Y*
- 26.55%
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 5.29%
- 1M
- -20.21%
- YTD
- -5.21%
- 6M
- 9.19%
- 1Y
- 88.79%
- 3Y*
- 38.49%
- 5Y*
- 20.27%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
XLKQ.L vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 18.20% | 15.76% | 44.03% | 51.84% | -20.58% | 36.28% | 37.93% | 44.38% | 2.54% | 21.82% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -5.21% | 130.26% | 23.21% | -6.20% | 15.75% | -11.83% | 41.04% | 12.68% | -3.48% | -5.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLKQ.L and SSLN.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLKQ.L vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLKQ.L
SSLN.L
XLKQ.L vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLKQ.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.30 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.09 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.86 | 4.71 | +2.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLKQ.L vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLKQ.L drawdown since its inception was -38.43%, smaller than the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -78.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKQ.L and SSLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLKQ.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.43% | -78.44% | +40.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -42.08% | +25.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.74% | -42.08% | +13.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.74% | -42.08% | +13.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.74% | -42.08% | +13.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.23% | -39.02% | +31.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.07% | -59.69% | +51.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.57% | 18.73% | -12.16% |
Volatility
XLKQ.L vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) is 8.58%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a volatility of 14.40%. This indicates that XLKQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLKQ.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 14.40% | -5.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.29% | 52.43% | -37.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.96% | 55.28% | -35.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.22% | 36.41% | -10.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.42% | 31.14% | -7.72% |
XLKQ.L vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLKQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLKQ.L vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLKQ.L nor SSLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLKQ.L and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SSLN.L.
XLKQ.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while SSLN.L is Silver. XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLKQ.L and 0.20% for SSLN.L.
Find the right allocation for XLKQ.L and SSLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer