XLKQ.L vs. PUST.PA
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA).
XLKQ.L and PUST.PA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLKQ.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. PUST.PA is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on May 20, 2014. Both XLKQ.L and PUST.PA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XLKQ.L vs. PUST.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XLKQ.L vs. PUST.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | -7.22% | 15.76% | 44.03% | 51.84% | -20.58% | 36.28% | 37.93% | 44.63% | 0.92% | 23.56% |
PUST.PA Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc | -3.86% | 11.37% | 29.18% | 47.06% | -26.13% | 30.51% | 43.74% | 32.44% | 5.68% | 21.01% |
Different Trading Currencies
XLKQ.L is traded in GBp, while PUST.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the PUST.PA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLKQ.L achieves a -7.22% return, which is significantly lower than PUST.PA's -3.86% return. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L has outperformed PUST.PA with an annualized return of 23.31%, while PUST.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 19.58% annualized return.
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- -7.22%
- 6M
- -6.26%
- 1Y
- 27.34%
- 3Y*
- 25.81%
- 5Y*
- 19.76%
- 10Y*
- 23.31%
PUST.PA
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- -3.86%
- 6M
- -2.04%
- 1Y
- 20.74%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- 13.82%
- 10Y*
- 19.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLKQ.L vs. PUST.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLKQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than PUST.PA's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XLKQ.L vs. PUST.PA — Risk / Return Rank
XLKQ.L
PUST.PA
XLKQ.L vs. PUST.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLKQ.L | PUST.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.04 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | 1.55 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 3.09 | -0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.80 | 9.06 | -3.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLKQ.L | PUST.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.04 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.70 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.14 | 0.98 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 1.00 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between XLKQ.L and PUST.PA is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XLKQ.L vs. PUST.PA - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLKQ.L nor PUST.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XLKQ.L vs. PUST.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLKQ.L drawdown since its inception was -28.74%, roughly equal to the maximum PUST.PA drawdown of -27.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKQ.L and PUST.PA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLKQ.L | PUST.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.74% | -31.40% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -10.09% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.74% | -31.40% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.74% | -31.40% | +2.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.31% | -7.65% | -5.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -5.95% | +0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.24% | 3.41% | +2.83% |
Volatility
XLKQ.L vs. PUST.PA - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) at 4.34%. This indicates that XLKQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUST.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XLKQ.L | PUST.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 4.34% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.60% | 11.64% | +2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.22% | 19.66% | +3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.92% | 19.45% | +2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 19.77% | +1.77% |