PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLK vs. TDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLK vs. TDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 36.47% return, which is significantly higher than TDV's 23.09% return.


XLK

1D
-1.00%
1M
21.09%
YTD
36.47%
6M
35.71%
1Y
66.93%
3Y*
33.90%
5Y*
23.83%
10Y*
25.84%

TDV

1D
-0.42%
1M
10.03%
YTD
23.09%
6M
21.07%
1Y
36.07%
3Y*
20.49%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLK vs. TDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
36.47%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%7.39%
TDV
ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF
23.09%16.05%9.72%27.29%-15.94%28.29%29.00%3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and TDV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.86

The correlation between XLK and TDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLK vs. TDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLK
TDV

Technology

99.7%
90.2%

Energy

0.2%

-

Industrials

0.1%
5.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.7%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XLK
99.7%
TDV
90.2%

Energy

XLK
0.2%
TDV

-

Industrials

XLK
0.1%
TDV
5.1%

Basic Materials

XLK

-

TDV

-

Communication Services

XLK

-

TDV

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLK

-

TDV

-

Consumer Defensive

XLK

-

TDV

-

Financial Services

XLK

-

TDV
4.7%

Healthcare

XLK

-

TDV

-

Real Estate

XLK

-

TDV

-

Utilities

XLK

-

TDV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLK vs. TDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

TDV
TDV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLKTDVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.24

2.10

+1.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.92

2.84

+1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.36

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

3.79

+0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.16

13.11

+1.05

XLK vs. TDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLK Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the TDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLK and TDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLKTDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

2.10

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.69

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.76

-0.34

Drawdowns

XLK vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than TDV's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and TDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKTDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

-32.78%

-49.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

-9.55%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-22.51%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

-25.11%

-8.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-0.42%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.96%

-5.36%

-29.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

2.76%

+1.98%

Volatility

XLK vs. TDV - Volatility Comparison

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 6.98% compared to ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) at 5.07%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKTDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.98%

5.07%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.68%

12.72%

+3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.82%

17.29%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.90%

20.45%

+4.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.49%

23.20%

+1.29%

XLK vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TDV's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLK vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than TDV's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TDV
ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF
0.93%1.09%1.16%1.16%1.67%1.08%1.10%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.39%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLK and TDV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to TDV (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs TDV's -32.78%.

On 5-year performance, XLK leads with 23.83% vs 13.94% for TDV. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLK has performed better with a 23.83% return vs 13.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for TDV.

TDV has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.39% for XLK.

XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while TDV tracks Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.66% for TDV.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLK and TDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer