XLK vs. SLVP
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) and SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 25.19%/yr vs 12.67%/yr for SLVP. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLK charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SLVP.
Performance
XLK vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than SLVP's -5.37% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed SLVP with an annualized return of 25.19%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively lower 12.67% annualized return.
XLK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 53.24%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.02%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
SLVP
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -21.72%
- YTD
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 83.53%
- 3Y*
- 48.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
XLK vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.52% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -5.37% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and SLVP is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.20 |
The correlation between XLK and SLVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLK vs. SLVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLK
SLVP
Technology
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XLK
SLVP
-
Energy
XLK
SLVP
-
Industrials
XLK
SLVP
-
Basic Materials
XLK
-
SLVP
Communication Services
XLK
-
SLVP
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLK
-
SLVP
-
Consumer Defensive
XLK
-
SLVP
-
Financial Services
XLK
-
SLVP
-
Healthcare
XLK
-
SLVP
-
Real Estate
XLK
-
SLVP
-
Utilities
XLK
-
SLVP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
SLVP
XLK vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLK | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.26 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 2.21 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.85 | 5.86 | +4.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLK vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, roughly equal to the maximum SLVP drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and SLVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -80.47% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -38.06% | +22.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -38.06% | +12.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -54.26% | +20.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -62.03% | +28.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -31.74% | +24.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.93% | -46.78% | +11.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 14.31% | -9.39% |
Volatility
XLK vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) is 10.86%, while iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a volatility of 19.61%. This indicates that XLK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.86% | 19.61% | -8.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.92% | 45.17% | -26.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.55% | 54.53% | -31.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.18% | 43.15% | -17.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 42.45% | -17.81% |
XLK vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLK vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than SLVP's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 1.88% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and SLVP have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVP has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to XLK (10.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs SLVP's -80.47%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.19% vs 12.67% for SLVP. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 10.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 12.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SLVP.
SLVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.41% for XLK.
XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while SLVP is Silver. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.39% for SLVP.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLK and SLVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer