XLK vs. SCHA
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while SCHA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 25.11%/yr vs 11.39%/yr for SCHA. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLK charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
XLK vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 27.41% return, which is significantly higher than SCHA's 21.09% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 25.11%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively lower 11.39% annualized return.
XLK
- 1D
- 3.73%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 27.41%
- 6M
- 24.16%
- 1Y
- 53.33%
- 3Y*
- 30.17%
- 5Y*
- 21.81%
- 10Y*
- 25.11%
SCHA
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 21.09%
- 6M
- 16.82%
- 1Y
- 39.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.39%
XLK vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 27.41% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 21.09% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and SCHA is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.72 |
The correlation between XLK and SCHA shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLK vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLK
SCHA
Technology
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XLK
SCHA
Energy
XLK
SCHA
Industrials
XLK
SCHA
Basic Materials
XLK
-
SCHA
Communication Services
XLK
-
SCHA
Consumer Cyclical
XLK
-
SCHA
Consumer Defensive
XLK
-
SCHA
Financial Services
XLK
-
SCHA
Healthcare
XLK
-
SCHA
Real Estate
XLK
-
SCHA
Utilities
XLK
-
SCHA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
SCHA
XLK vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLK | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.36 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 4.17 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | 15.27 | -4.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLK vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -42.41% | -39.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -9.50% | -6.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -27.29% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -30.79% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -42.41% | +8.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.57% | 0.00% | -7.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.93% | -7.57% | -27.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 2.59% | +2.31% |
Volatility
XLK vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.87% compared to Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) at 6.55%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.87% | 6.55% | +4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.91% | 13.72% | +5.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.54% | 18.60% | +3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 22.03% | +3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 22.75% | +1.89% |
XLK vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLK vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than SCHA's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 0.99% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.42% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and SCHA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (10.87%) compared to SCHA (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.11% vs 11.39% for SCHA. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHA has been the lower-risk option at 6.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.11% return vs 11.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLK.
SCHA has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.42% for XLK.
XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while SCHA is Small Cap Blend Equities. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.04% for SCHA.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLK and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer