XLK vs. LMT
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 25.04%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for LMT. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLK vs. LMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.09% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 8.80% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 25.04%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.91% annualized return.
XLK
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 28.09%
- 6M
- 25.10%
- 1Y
- 55.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.33%
- 5Y*
- 22.26%
- 10Y*
- 25.04%
LMT
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 10.88%
- 3Y*
- 6.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
XLK vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.09% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 8.80% | 2.47% | 10.02% | -4.31% | 40.48% | 3.15% | -6.49% | 52.55% | -16.35% | 31.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and LMT is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998 | 0.29 |
The correlation between XLK and LMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (3 years) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
LMT
XLK vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLK | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.10 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 0.43 | +3.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.58 | 1.04 | +10.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLK | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 0.41 | +2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.40 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.02 | 0.46 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.38 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
XLK vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, roughly equal to the maximum LMT drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and LMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -79.29% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -25.15% | +9.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -31.79% | +6.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -31.79% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -36.67% | +3.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.08% | -22.64% | +15.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -26.84% | -8.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | 10.51% | -5.71% |
Volatility
XLK vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.42% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 5.31%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.42% | 5.31% | +5.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.32% | 19.60% | -1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.08% | 26.62% | -4.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.10% | 22.88% | +2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 23.72% | +0.88% |
Dividends
XLK vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than LMT's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.62% | 2.76% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and LMT have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to LMT (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs LMT's -79.29%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLK and LMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer