PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLK vs. ANGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLK vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 22.34% return, which is significantly higher than ANGL's 2.15% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed ANGL with an annualized return of 23.89%, while ANGL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.77% annualized return.


XLK

1D
0.07%
1M
-8.11%
6M
20.96%
YTD
22.34%
1Y
35.41%
3Y*
26.73%
5Y*
19.16%
10Y*
23.89%
ALL TIME*
10.23%

ANGL

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.07%
6M
1.41%
YTD
2.15%
1Y
6.47%
3Y*
8.07%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*
5.77%
ALL TIME*
6.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLK vs. ANGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
22.34%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%
ANGL
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
2.15%9.04%6.06%12.52%-14.26%6.84%13.20%18.06%-5.84%9.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and ANGL is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2012

0.46

The correlation between XLK and ANGL shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLK vs. ANGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

ANGL
ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLKANGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

1.60

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.53

6.73

-0.20

XLK vs. ANGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLK Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the ANGL Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLK and ANGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLK vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than ANGL's maximum drawdown of -29.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and ANGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKANGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

-29.31%

-52.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

-4.05%

-11.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-5.48%

-20.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

-19.25%

-14.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

-29.31%

-4.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.25%

-0.51%

-10.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.83%

-3.27%

-31.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.43%

0.96%

+4.47%

Volatility

XLK vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 9.59% compared to VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) at 0.74%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKANGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.59%

0.74%

+8.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.94%

3.58%

+17.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.61%

4.31%

+20.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.57%

7.63%

+17.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.81%

9.23%

+15.58%

XLK vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ANGL's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLK vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than ANGL's 6.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANGL
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
6.46%6.20%6.29%5.27%4.72%3.90%4.67%5.19%5.99%5.25%5.34%5.81%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.45%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLK and ANGL have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to ANGL (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs ANGL's -29.31%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 23.89% vs 5.77% for ANGL. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ANGL has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 23.89% return vs 5.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ANGL.

ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 0.45% for XLK.

XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while ANGL is High Yield Bonds. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while ANGL tracks ICE US Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.25% for ANGL.

ANGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLK and ANGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer