XLI vs. HDV
XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLI returned 14.15%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for HDV. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.
Performance
XLI vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLI achieves a 13.90% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 15.30% return. Over the past 10 years, XLI has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 14.15%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.47% annualized return.
XLI
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 13.90%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 25.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
HDV
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 15.30%
- 6M
- 15.20%
- 1Y
- 21.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
XLI vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 13.90% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 15.30% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLI and HDV is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLI and HDV has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLI vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLI
HDV
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
XLI
HDV
Utilities
XLI
HDV
Technology
XLI
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
XLI
HDV
Basic Materials
XLI
-
HDV
Communication Services
XLI
-
HDV
Consumer Defensive
XLI
-
HDV
Energy
XLI
-
HDV
Financial Services
XLI
-
HDV
Healthcare
XLI
-
HDV
Real Estate
XLI
-
HDV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLI vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
XLI
HDV
XLI vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLI | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.38 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 4.18 | -2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | 11.59 | -3.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLI vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLI drawdown since its inception was -62.26%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLI and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLI | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.26% | -37.04% | -25.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -5.18% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.49% | -10.49% | -8.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.64% | -15.42% | -6.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -37.04% | -5.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -0.29% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -3.08% | -6.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 1.87% | +1.22% |
Volatility
XLI vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.10%. This indicates that XLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLI | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 3.10% | +3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.59% | 7.44% | +6.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.17% | 9.73% | +6.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 12.83% | +4.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 15.73% | +4.31% |
XLI vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XLI and HDV have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLI vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
XLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than HDV's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.84% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLI and HDV have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLI has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to HDV (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLI dropped -62.26% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 10-year performance, XLI leads with 14.15% vs 9.47% for HDV. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLI has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLI and HDV have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 1.16% for XLI.
XLI is categorized as Industrials Equities, while HDV is Dividend. XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLI and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer