XLI vs. ES
XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index, while ES (Eversource Energy) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLI returned 13.99%/yr vs 5.58%/yr for ES. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLI vs. ES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLI achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly higher than ES's 3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, XLI has outperformed ES with an annualized return of 13.99%, while ES has yielded a comparatively lower 5.58% annualized return.
XLI
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 12.52%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 22.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.72%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
ES
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 6.87%
- 1Y
- 9.27%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.28%
- 10Y*
- 5.58%
XLI vs. ES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 12.52% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
ES Eversource Energy | 3.55% | 22.86% | -2.46% | -23.43% | -5.06% | 8.18% | 4.45% | 34.49% | 6.41% | 17.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLI and ES is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLI vs. ES — Risk / Return Rank
XLI
ES
XLI vs. ES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and Eversource Energy (ES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLI | ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.10 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 0.62 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | 1.50 | +5.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLI | ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 0.38 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.01 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.23 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.28 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
XLI vs. ES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLI drawdown since its inception was -62.26%, smaller than the maximum ES drawdown of -73.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLI and ES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLI | ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.26% | -73.04% | +10.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -15.13% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.49% | -28.65% | +10.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.64% | -41.69% | +20.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -41.69% | -0.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -13.96% | +11.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.21% | -19.07% | +9.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 6.19% | -3.12% |
Volatility
XLI vs. ES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) is 4.80%, while Eversource Energy (ES) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that XLI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLI | ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 6.82% | -2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.79% | 15.38% | -2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.38% | 24.22% | -8.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.42% | 23.87% | -6.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 24.31% | -4.33% |
Dividends
XLI vs. ES - Dividend Comparison
XLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than ES's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ES Eversource Energy | 4.52% | 4.47% | 4.98% | 4.37% | 3.04% | 2.65% | 2.62% | 2.52% | 3.11% | 3.01% | 3.22% | 3.27% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.18% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLI and ES have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ES has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to XLI (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLI dropped -62.26% vs ES's -73.04%.
XLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLI and ES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer