PortfoliosLab logo
ES vs. DUK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ES and DUK is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ES vs. DUK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eversource Energy (ES) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ES:

0.31

DUK:

0.78

Sortino Ratio

ES:

0.54

DUK:

1.16

Omega Ratio

ES:

1.07

DUK:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

ES:

0.19

DUK:

1.21

Martin Ratio

ES:

0.78

DUK:

3.05

Ulcer Index

ES:

8.65%

DUK:

4.59%

Daily Std Dev

ES:

24.25%

DUK:

18.16%

Max Drawdown

ES:

-65.47%

DUK:

-71.92%

Current Drawdown

ES:

-25.02%

DUK:

-8.85%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ES:

$22.87B

DUK:

$90.05B

EPS

ES:

$2.28

DUK:

$6.03

PE Ratio

ES:

27.30

DUK:

19.21

PEG Ratio

ES:

0.93

DUK:

3.09

PS Ratio

ES:

1.80

DUK:

2.95

PB Ratio

ES:

1.49

DUK:

1.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

ES:

$12.69B

DUK:

$30.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ES:

$4.91B

DUK:

$20.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

ES:

$4.26B

DUK:

$15.13B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ES achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly higher than DUK's 5.92% return. Over the past 10 years, ES has underperformed DUK with an annualized return of 5.99%, while DUK has yielded a comparatively higher 8.39% annualized return.


ES

YTD

10.87%

1M

11.70%

6M

6.42%

1Y

7.58%

5Y*

-0.57%

10Y*

5.99%

DUK

YTD

5.92%

1M

-4.94%

6M

2.97%

1Y

14.14%

5Y*

10.76%

10Y*

8.39%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ES vs. DUK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ES
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ES is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ES is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ES is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ES is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ES is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ES is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

DUK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DUK is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DUK is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DUK is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DUK is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DUK is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DUK is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ES vs. DUK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eversource Energy (ES) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ES Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the DUK Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ES and DUK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ES vs. DUK - Dividend Comparison

ES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than DUK's 3.68% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ES
Eversource Energy
4.61%4.98%4.37%3.04%2.65%2.62%2.52%3.11%3.01%3.22%3.27%2.93%
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
3.68%3.84%4.18%3.86%3.72%4.17%4.11%4.21%4.15%4.33%4.54%3.77%

Drawdowns

ES vs. DUK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ES drawdown since its inception was -65.47%, smaller than the maximum DUK drawdown of -71.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ES and DUK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ES vs. DUK - Volatility Comparison

Eversource Energy (ES) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) at 6.46%. This indicates that ES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ES vs. DUK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eversource Energy and Duke Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B20212022202320242025
4.12B
8.25B
(ES) Total Revenue
(DUK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ES vs. DUK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Eversource Energy and Duke Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
55.6%
51.9%
(ES) Gross Margin
(DUK) Gross Margin
ES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eversource Energy reported a gross profit of 2.29B and revenue of 4.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.6%.

DUK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Duke Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.28B and revenue of 8.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.9%.

ES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eversource Energy reported an operating income of 926.39M and revenue of 4.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

DUK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Duke Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 2.34B and revenue of 8.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

ES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eversource Energy reported a net income of 550.79M and revenue of 4.12B, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.

DUK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Duke Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.38B and revenue of 8.25B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.