PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLG vs. SPXE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLG vs. SPXE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF (SPXE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XLG

1D
1.88%
1M
-1.70%
YTD
5.56%
6M
6.64%
1Y
25.51%
3Y*
22.53%
5Y*
15.57%
10Y*
17.23%

SPXE

1D
-0.21%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLG vs. SPXE - Yearly Performance Comparison


XLG vs. SPXE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLG
SPXE

Technology

45.9%
39.2%

Communication Services

15.9%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
9.7%

Financial Services

9.5%
11.9%

Healthcare

7.4%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
4.8%

Energy

2.6%
0.0%

Industrials

2.0%
8.1%

Basic Materials

0.6%
1.8%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Technology

XLG
45.9%
SPXE
39.2%

Communication Services

XLG
15.9%
SPXE
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XLG
10.6%
SPXE
9.7%

Financial Services

XLG
9.5%
SPXE
11.9%

Healthcare

XLG
7.4%
SPXE
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

XLG
5.5%
SPXE
4.8%

Energy

XLG
2.6%
SPXE
0.0%

Industrials

XLG
2.0%
SPXE
8.1%

Basic Materials

XLG
0.6%
SPXE
1.8%

Real Estate

XLG

-

SPXE
1.9%

Utilities

XLG

-

SPXE
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLG vs. SPXE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLG
XLG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLG vs. SPXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF (SPXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLGSPXEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.55

XLG vs. SPXE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLG vs. SPXE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than SPXE's maximum drawdown of -0.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and SPXE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLGSPXEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.39%

-0.21%

-52.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-0.21%

-3.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-0.21%

-7.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

Volatility

XLG vs. SPXE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLGSPXEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.88%

XLG vs. SPXE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLG vs. SPXE - Dividend Comparison

XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while SPXE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPXE
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
0.61%0.64%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, SPXE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.

XLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for SPXE.

XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while SPXE tracks S&P 500 Ex-Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XLG and 0.09% for SPXE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLG and SPXE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer