XLG vs. SKYY
XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) and SKYY (First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while SKYY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ISE Cloud Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLG returned 16.96%/yr vs 16.26%/yr for SKYY. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SKYY.
Performance
XLG vs. SKYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLG achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly higher than SKYY's 3.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLG having a 16.96% annualized return and SKYY not far behind at 16.26%.
XLG
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 4.26%
- 1Y
- 21.79%
- 3Y*
- 22.23%
- 5Y*
- 15.12%
- 10Y*
- 16.96%
SKYY
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 13.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 5.69%
- 10Y*
- 16.26%
XLG vs. SKYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 3.62% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
SKYY First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund | 3.03% | 9.20% | 35.87% | 52.18% | -44.68% | 10.62% | 57.77% | 25.25% | 6.01% | 33.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLG and SKYY is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2011 | 0.78 |
The correlation between XLG and SKYY shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLG vs. SKYY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLG
SKYY
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XLG
SKYY
Communication Services
XLG
SKYY
Consumer Cyclical
XLG
SKYY
Financial Services
XLG
SKYY
-
Healthcare
XLG
SKYY
Consumer Defensive
XLG
SKYY
-
Energy
XLG
SKYY
-
Industrials
XLG
SKYY
Basic Materials
XLG
SKYY
-
Real Estate
XLG
-
SKYY
-
Utilities
XLG
-
SKYY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLG vs. SKYY — Risk / Return Rank
XLG
SKYY
XLG vs. SKYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund (SKYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLG | SKYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.11 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 0.51 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 1.13 | +5.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLG vs. SKYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, roughly equal to the maximum SKYY drawdown of -53.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and SKYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLG | SKYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.39% | -53.20% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.41% | -27.39% | +14.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.70% | -31.80% | +11.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.02% | -53.20% | +25.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.46% | -53.20% | +22.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.06% | -13.63% | +8.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -10.90% | +3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 12.34% | -8.96% |
Volatility
XLG vs. SKYY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) is 4.31%, while First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund (SKYY) has a volatility of 13.09%. This indicates that XLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SKYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLG | SKYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 13.09% | -8.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.41% | 23.88% | -13.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.70% | 28.45% | -14.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 30.67% | -11.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 26.90% | -8.03% |
XLG vs. SKYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SKYY's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLG vs. SKYY - Dividend Comparison
XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while SKYY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKYY First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.23% | 0.78% | 0.17% | 0.54% | 0.37% | 0.27% | 0.35% | 0.41% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.62% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLG and SKYY have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKYY has higher volatility (13.09%) compared to XLG (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLG dropped -52.39% vs SKYY's -53.20%.
On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 16.96% vs 16.26% for SKYY. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 16.96% return vs 16.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SKYY.
XLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for SKYY.
XLG is categorized as S&P 500, while SKYY is Technology Equities. XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while SKYY tracks ISE Cloud Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XLG and 0.60% for SKYY.
XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLG and SKYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer