XLG vs. IGM
XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) and IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLG returned 16.96%/yr vs 24.57%/yr for IGM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGM.
Performance
XLG vs. IGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLG achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 23.42% return. Over the past 10 years, XLG has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of 16.96%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 24.57% annualized return.
XLG
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 4.26%
- 1Y
- 21.79%
- 3Y*
- 22.23%
- 5Y*
- 15.12%
- 10Y*
- 16.96%
IGM
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 23.42%
- 6M
- 23.24%
- 1Y
- 48.57%
- 3Y*
- 35.37%
- 5Y*
- 20.09%
- 10Y*
- 24.57%
XLG vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 3.62% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 23.42% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLG and IGM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2005 | 0.89 |
The correlation between XLG and IGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLG vs. IGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLG
IGM
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XLG
IGM
Communication Services
XLG
IGM
Consumer Cyclical
XLG
IGM
Financial Services
XLG
IGM
Healthcare
XLG
IGM
-
Consumer Defensive
XLG
IGM
-
Energy
XLG
IGM
Industrials
XLG
IGM
Basic Materials
XLG
IGM
-
Real Estate
XLG
-
IGM
-
Utilities
XLG
-
IGM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLG vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank
XLG
IGM
XLG vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLG | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.37 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 2.97 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 10.06 | -3.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLG vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, smaller than the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and IGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLG | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.39% | -65.59% | +13.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.41% | -16.44% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.70% | -26.39% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.02% | -40.68% | +12.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.46% | -40.68% | +10.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.06% | -6.80% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -15.22% | +7.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 4.84% | -1.46% |
Volatility
XLG vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) is 4.31%, while iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a volatility of 10.03%. This indicates that XLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLG | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 10.03% | -5.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.41% | 18.11% | -7.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.70% | 21.98% | -8.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 25.91% | -7.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 24.66% | -5.79% |
XLG vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IGM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLG vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison
XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than IGM's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.62% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLG and IGM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to XLG (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLG dropped -52.39% vs IGM's -65.59%.
On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 24.57% vs 16.96% for XLG. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 24.57% return vs 16.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGM.
XLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.13% for IGM.
XLG is categorized as S&P 500, while IGM is Technology Equities. XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XLG and 0.39% for IGM.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLG and IGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer