XLG vs. CPSM
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM).
XLG and CPSM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 4, 2005. CPSM is an actively managed fund by Calamos. It was launched on May 1, 2024.
Performance
XLG vs. CPSM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XLG vs. CPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | -7.82% | 19.51% | 24.03% |
CPSM Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May | 0.81% | 7.21% | 6.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLG achieves a -7.82% return, which is significantly lower than CPSM's 0.81% return.
XLG
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- -7.82%
- 6M
- -4.84%
- 1Y
- 19.36%
- 3Y*
- 21.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.64%
CPSM
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 7.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLG vs. CPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CPSM's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XLG vs. CPSM — Risk / Return Rank
XLG
CPSM
XLG vs. CPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLG | CPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 1.10 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.70 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.45 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 1.51 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.67 | 9.75 | -4.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLG | CPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.10 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.47 | -0.88 |
Correlation
The correlation between XLG and CPSM is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XLG vs. CPSM - Dividend Comparison
XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, while CPSM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.70% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
CPSM Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XLG vs. CPSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than CPSM's maximum drawdown of -5.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and CPSM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLG | CPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.39% | -5.19% | -47.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.41% | -4.99% | -7.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.56% | -0.08% | -9.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.69% | -0.22% | -7.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 0.77% | +2.72% |
Volatility
XLG vs. CPSM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM) at 0.68%. This indicates that XLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XLG | CPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | 0.68% | +5.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.64% | 1.18% | +9.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.97% | 6.69% | +13.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 5.31% | +13.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.81% | 5.31% | +13.50% |