XLFI vs. XLF
XLFI (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLFI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. XLFI is actively managed, while XLF is passively managed. Over the past year, XLFI returned 11.31% vs 12.50% for XLF. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. XLFI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.
Performance
XLFI vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLFI achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 4.86% return.
XLFI
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- 6M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 3.17%
- 1Y
- 11.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.72%
XLF
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 7.47%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- 12.50%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.84B | $1.93B | $1.92B | |
| $205.39K | $226.21K | $175.11K |
XLFI vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLFI State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 3.17% | 5.40% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 4.86% | 4.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLFI and XLF is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.97 |
The correlation between XLFI and XLF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLFI vs. XLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLFI
XLF
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLFI
XLF
Basic Materials
XLFI
-
XLF
-
Communication Services
XLFI
-
XLF
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLFI
-
XLF
-
Consumer Defensive
XLFI
-
XLF
-
Energy
XLFI
-
XLF
-
Healthcare
XLFI
-
XLF
-
Industrials
XLFI
-
XLF
Real Estate
XLFI
-
XLF
-
Technology
XLFI
-
XLF
Utilities
XLFI
-
XLF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLFI vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
XLFI
XLF
XLFI vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLFI) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLFI | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.13 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 0.71 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.26 | 1.80 | +0.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLFI vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLFI drawdown since its inception was -11.89%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLFI and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLFI | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.89% | -82.69% | +70.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.89% | -14.79% | +2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -1.15% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.02% | -19.92% | +16.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 5.79% | -1.57% |
Volatility
XLFI vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLFI) is 2.78%, while State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that XLFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLFI | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 4.07% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 11.10% | -2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 14.77% | -2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.85% | 18.45% | -6.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.85% | 22.08% | -10.23% |
XLFI vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLFI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLFI vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
XLFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.29%, more than XLF's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.42% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
XLFI State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.29% | 5.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, XLFI and XLF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XLF has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to XLFI (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLFI dropped -11.89% vs XLF's -82.69%.
On 1-year performance, XLF leads with 12.50% vs 11.31% for XLFI. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLFI has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XLF has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 11.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLFI.
XLFI has the higher dividend yield at 11.29%, compared with 1.42% for XLF.
XLFI is categorized as Derivative Income, while XLF is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLFI and 0.08% for XLF.
XLFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLFI and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer