PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLFI vs. RSPF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLFI vs. RSPF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLFI) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLFI achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly lower than RSPF's 6.30% return.


XLFI

1D
-0.50%
1M
3.86%
6M
2.74%
YTD
2.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSPF

1D
-0.60%
1M
6.75%
6M
5.48%
YTD
6.30%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*
12.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLFI vs. RSPF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLFI and RSPF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.90

XLFI vs. RSPF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLFI
RSPF

Financial Services

99.9%
92.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

1.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

6.1%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

XLFI
99.9%
RSPF
92.6%

Basic Materials

XLFI

-

RSPF

-

Communication Services

XLFI

-

RSPF

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLFI

-

RSPF

-

Consumer Defensive

XLFI

-

RSPF

-

Energy

XLFI

-

RSPF

-

Healthcare

XLFI

-

RSPF

-

Industrials

XLFI

-

RSPF
1.3%

Real Estate

XLFI

-

RSPF

-

Technology

XLFI

-

RSPF
6.1%

Utilities

XLFI

-

RSPF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLFI vs. RSPF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLFI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


RSPF
RSPF Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
RSPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPF Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPF Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLFI vs. RSPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLFI) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLFIRSPFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.75

XLFI vs. RSPF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLFI vs. RSPF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLFI drawdown since its inception was -11.89%, smaller than the maximum RSPF drawdown of -81.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLFI and RSPF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLFIRSPFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.89%

-81.32%

+69.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.60%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-18.93%

+15.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.16%

Volatility

XLFI vs. RSPF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLFIRSPFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.95%

15.29%

-3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.95%

19.72%

-7.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.95%

22.83%

-10.88%

XLFI vs. RSPF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLFI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPF's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLFI vs. RSPF - Dividend Comparison

XLFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.38%, more than RSPF's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPF
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF
1.52%1.55%1.65%2.16%1.95%1.56%2.24%1.85%2.51%1.28%37.55%2.17%
XLFI
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
11.38%5.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLFI and RSPF have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLFI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLFI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPF.

XLFI has the higher dividend yield at 11.38%, compared with 1.52% for RSPF.

XLFI is categorized as Derivative Income, while RSPF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLFI and 0.40% for RSPF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLFI and RSPF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer