XLFI vs. BIL
XLFI (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLFI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. XLFI is actively managed, while BIL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. XLFI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.
Performance
XLFI vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLFI achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.82% return.
XLFI
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIL
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 3.82%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- 2.21%
XLFI vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLFI State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 1.06% | 5.40% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.82% | 1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLFI and BIL is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLFI vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
XLFI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BIL
XLFI vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLFI) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLFI | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 87.94 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 355.51 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2,818.99 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLFI vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLFI drawdown since its inception was -11.89%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLFI and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLFI | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.89% | -0.78% | -11.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | 0.00% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -0.26% | -2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
XLFI vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLFI | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.05% | 0.20% | +11.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.05% | 0.26% | +11.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.05% | 0.26% | +11.79% |
XLFI vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLFI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLFI vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
XLFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.52%, more than BIL's 3.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.82% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
XLFI State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.52% | 5.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLFI and BIL have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLFI.
XLFI has the higher dividend yield at 11.52%, compared with 3.82% for BIL.
XLFI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BIL is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLFI and 0.14% for BIL.
Find the right allocation for XLFI and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer