XLF vs. XLI
XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index, while XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLF returned 13.37%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for XLI. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.
Performance
XLF vs. XLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly lower than XLI's 15.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLF having a 13.37% annualized return and XLI not far ahead at 13.76%.
XLF
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- 6M
- 3.83%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 1Y
- 8.32%
- 3Y*
- 18.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.80%
- 10Y*
- 13.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.03%
XLI
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- 6M
- 7.29%
- YTD
- 15.43%
- 1Y
- 19.12%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.61%
XLF vs. XLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3.21% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 15.43% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLF and XLI is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLF and XLI has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLF vs. XLI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLF
XLI
Financial Services
-
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XLF
XLI
-
Technology
XLF
XLI
Industrials
XLF
XLI
Basic Materials
XLF
-
XLI
Communication Services
XLF
-
XLI
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLF
-
XLI
Consumer Defensive
XLF
-
XLI
-
Energy
XLF
-
XLI
-
Healthcare
XLF
-
XLI
-
Real Estate
XLF
-
XLI
-
Utilities
XLF
-
XLI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLF vs. XLI — Risk / Return Rank
XLF
XLI
XLF vs. XLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLF | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.20 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 1.57 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.43 | 6.09 | -4.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLF vs. XLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than XLI's maximum drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and XLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLF | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.69% | -62.26% | -20.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.79% | -12.21% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.54% | -18.49% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.81% | -21.64% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.86% | -42.33% | -0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | -4.01% | +2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -9.17% | -10.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.81% | 3.15% | +2.66% |
Volatility
XLF vs. XLI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) is 4.07%, while Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that XLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLF | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 5.03% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.28% | 13.80% | -2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 16.68% | -2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 17.53% | +0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.07% | 20.01% | +2.06% |
XLF vs. XLI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XLF and XLI have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLF vs. XLI - Dividend Comparison
XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than XLI's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.44% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLF and XLI have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLI has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to XLF (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLF dropped -82.69% vs XLI's -62.26%.
On 10-year performance, XLI leads with 13.76% vs 13.37% for XLF. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLI has performed better with a 13.76% return vs 13.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLF and XLI have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.
XLF has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.16% for XLI.
XLF is categorized as Financials Equities, while XLI is Industrials Equities. XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index, while XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index.
XLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLF and XLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer