XLF vs. PBEU
XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) and PBEU (Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - XLF tracks the Financial Select Sector Index while PBEU tracks the BITA European Banks Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLF charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBEU.
Performance
XLF vs. PBEU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than PBEU's 13.63% return.
XLF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- -1.95%
- 1Y
- 7.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
PBEU
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 7.22%
- YTD
- 13.63%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLF vs. PBEU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.77% | 5.92% |
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF | 13.63% | 11.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLF and PBEU is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLF vs. PBEU — Risk / Return Rank
XLF
PBEU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLF vs. PBEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF (PBEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLF | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLF vs. PBEU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than PBEU's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and PBEU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLF | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.69% | -17.26% | -65.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.64% | -1.42% | -2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.99% | -3.94% | -16.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.79% | — | — |
Volatility
XLF vs. PBEU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLF | PBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.62% | 27.63% | -13.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.58% | 27.63% | -9.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 27.63% | -5.52% |
XLF vs. PBEU - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PBEU's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLF vs. PBEU - Dividend Comparison
XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than PBEU's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.50% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLF and PBEU have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for PBEU.
XLF has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.01% for PBEU.
XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index, while PBEU tracks BITA European Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLF and 0.13% for PBEU.
Find the right allocation for XLF and PBEU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer