XLF vs. KWT
XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) and KWT (iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - XLF tracks the Financial Select Sector Index while KWT tracks the MSCI All Kuwait Select Size Liquidity Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLF returned 11.37%/yr vs 8.57%/yr for KWT. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLF charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for KWT.
Performance
XLF vs. KWT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly higher than KWT's -3.12% return.
XLF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 4.51%
- 1Y
- 10.81%
- 3Y*
- 19.83%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- 13.55%
KWT
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- 6M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- -3.12%
- 1Y
- -0.91%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- —
XLF vs. KWT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 4.51% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | 16.91% |
KWT iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF | -3.12% | 25.38% | 11.29% | -4.71% | 5.16% | 30.73% | 7.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLF and KWT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.34 |
XLF vs. KWT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLF
KWT
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XLF
KWT
Technology
XLF
KWT
-
Industrials
XLF
KWT
Basic Materials
XLF
-
KWT
Communication Services
XLF
-
KWT
Consumer Cyclical
XLF
-
KWT
Consumer Defensive
XLF
-
KWT
Energy
XLF
-
KWT
-
Healthcare
XLF
-
KWT
-
Real Estate
XLF
-
KWT
Utilities
XLF
-
KWT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLF vs. KWT — Risk / Return Rank
XLF
KWT
XLF vs. KWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF (KWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLF | KWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.00 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | -0.08 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.86 | -0.17 | +2.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLF vs. KWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than KWT's maximum drawdown of -24.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and KWT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLF | KWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.69% | -24.37% | -58.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.79% | -11.54% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.54% | -15.12% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.81% | -24.37% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.80% | +7.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -7.29% | -12.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.81% | 5.31% | +0.50% |
Volatility
XLF vs. KWT - Volatility Comparison
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF (KWT) at 3.24%. This indicates that XLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLF | KWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 3.24% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.24% | 10.20% | +1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.64% | 13.38% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 13.64% | +4.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 13.91% | +8.15% |
XLF vs. KWT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than KWT's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLF vs. KWT - Dividend Comparison
XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than KWT's 5.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KWT iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF | 5.68% | 5.40% | 6.09% | 2.25% | 5.87% | 7.65% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.42% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLF and KWT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLF has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to KWT (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLF dropped -82.69% vs KWT's -24.37%.
On 5-year performance, XLF leads with 11.37% vs 8.57% for KWT. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, KWT has been the lower-risk option at 3.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLF has performed better with a 11.37% return vs 8.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for KWT.
KWT has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 1.42% for XLF.
XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index, while KWT tracks MSCI All Kuwait Select Size Liquidity Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLF and 0.74% for KWT.
XLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLF and KWT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer