XLF vs. HSBH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) and HSBH (HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - XLF tracks the Financial Select Sector Index while HSBH tracks the HSBC Holdings plc Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XLF returned 7.67% vs 71.13% for HSBH. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLF charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for HSBH.

Performance

XLF vs. HSBH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than HSBH's 26.93% return.

XLF

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 4.10%
• YTD: -0.77%
• 6M: -1.95%
• 1Y: 7.67%
• 3Y*: 19.94%
• 5Y*: 10.00%
• 10Y*: 13.72%

HSBH

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 5.69%
• YTD: 26.93%
• 6M: 26.23%
• 1Y: 71.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLF vs. HSBH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	-0.77%	17.33%
HSBH HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF	26.93%	39.95%

Correlation

The correlation between XLF and HSBH is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.44

XLF vs. HSBH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLF	HSBH
Financial Services	98.0%	97.4%
Technology	1.8%	-
Industrials	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLF vs. HSBH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLF

XLF Risk / Return Rank: 15
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 16
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 15

HSBH

HSBH Risk / Return Rank: 90
HSBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
HSBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
HSBH Omega Ratio Rank: 90
HSBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
HSBH Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLF vs. HSBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLF	HSBH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.53	3.02	-2.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.81	3.80	-2.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.52	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	4.83	-4.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.33	17.50	-16.17

XLF vs. HSBH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLF Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the HSBH Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLF and HSBH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLF vs. HSBH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than HSBH's maximum drawdown of -14.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and HSBH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLF	HSBH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.69%	-14.81%	-67.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.79%	-14.81%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.64%	-0.47%	-3.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.99%	-2.33%	-17.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.79%	4.08%	+1.71%

Volatility

XLF vs. HSBH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) is 4.12%, while HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that XLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSBH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLF	HSBH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.12%	8.22%	-4.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.27%	19.28%	-8.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.62%	23.64%	-9.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.58%	22.88%	-4.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.11%	22.88%	-0.77%

XLF vs. HSBH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than HSBH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLF vs. HSBH - Dividend Comparison

XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than HSBH's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HSBH HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF	2.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.50%	1.31%	1.42%	1.71%	2.04%	1.63%	2.03%	1.87%	2.08%	1.48%	21.10%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLF and HSBH in my portfolio?

XLF and HSBH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLF or HSBH?

HSBH has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to XLF (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLF dropped -82.69% vs HSBH's -14.81%.

Which ETF is better, XLF or HSBH?

On 1-year performance, HSBH leads with 71.13% vs 7.67% for XLF. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLF or HSBH?

Over the 1-year period, HSBH has performed better with a 71.13% return vs 7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLF or HSBH?

XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for HSBH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLF or HSBH?

HSBH has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.50% for XLF.

What is the main difference between XLF and HSBH?

XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index, while HSBH tracks HSBC Holdings plc Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLF and 0.19% for HSBH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HSBH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.