PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XLF vs. FLGB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XLF vs. FLGB

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) and FLGB (Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index, while FLGB is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLF returned 9.15%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for FLGB. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLF charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLGB.

Performance

XLF vs. FLGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a -2.11% return, which is significantly lower than FLGB's 6.90% return.

XLF

1D
1.37%
1M
4.00%
YTD
-2.11%
6M
-2.09%
1Y
8.41%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
13.33%

FLGB

1D
0.62%
1M
1.23%
YTD
6.90%
6M
10.66%
1Y
20.66%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLF vs. FLGB - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF		-2.11%14.90%30.56%12.03%-10.59%34.80%-1.74%31.88%-13.06%4.70%
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF		6.90%33.73%8.77%14.33%-6.00%17.14%-9.47%23.23%-11.60%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between XLF and FLGB is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.61

The correlation between XLF and FLGB shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLF vs. FLGB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XLF
FLGB

Financial Services

98.0%
25.6%

Technology

1.8%
0.6%

Industrials

0.2%
12.9%

Basic Materials

-

8.7%

Communication Services

-

2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

14.2%

Energy

-

11.3%

Healthcare

-

13.3%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Utilities

-

4.9%

Financial Services

XLF
98.0%
FLGB
25.6%

Technology

XLF
1.8%
FLGB
0.6%

Industrials

XLF
0.2%
FLGB
12.9%

Basic Materials

XLF

-

FLGB
8.7%

Communication Services

XLF

-

FLGB
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XLF

-

FLGB
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

XLF

-

FLGB
14.2%

Energy

XLF

-

FLGB
11.3%

Healthcare

XLF

-

FLGB
13.3%

Real Estate

XLF

-

FLGB
0.8%

Utilities

XLF

-

FLGB
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF

Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF

Often compared with XLF:
XLF vs. SPYXLF vs. VFHXLF vs. KBWBXLF vs. XLVXLF vs. KREXLF vs. KBEXLF vs. JPM
Often compared with FLGB:
FLGB vs. EWUFLGB vs. FLAUFLGB vs. FLEEFLGB vs. IUKD.LFLGB vs. VFIAXFLGB vs. EUFNFLGB vs. HEDJ

Return for Risk

XLF vs. FLGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XLF
XLF Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
FLGB
FLGB Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FLGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGB Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLF vs. FLGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XLFFLGBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.42
1.36

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.67
1.97

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.24

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

1.92

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

6.84

-5.76

XLF vs. FLGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLF Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the FLGB Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLF and FLGB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLF vs. FLGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than FLGB's maximum drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and FLGB.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XLFFLGBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.69%

-42.61%

-40.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.79%

-10.26%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-13.13%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.81%

-25.90%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.86%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.94%

-3.09%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.01%

-6.68%

-13.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.76%

2.89%

+2.87%

Volatility

XLF vs. FLGB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) is 4.23%, while Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that XLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XLFFLGBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

5.27%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

12.30%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

14.48%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.66%

16.67%

+1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.17%

18.97%

+3.20%

XLF vs. FLGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FLGB's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLF vs. FLGB - Dividend Comparison

XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than FLGB's 3.27% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF		3.27%3.50%4.42%3.95%4.23%2.93%2.67%4.30%3.92%0.43%0.00%0.00%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF		1.49%1.31%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%21.10%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

XLF and FLGB have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLGB has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to XLF (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLF dropped -82.69% vs FLGB's -42.61%.

On 5-year performance, FLGB leads with 10.82% vs 9.15% for XLF. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLGB has performed better with a 10.82% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLGB.

FLGB has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.49% for XLF.

XLF is categorized as Financials Equities, while FLGB is Europe Equities. XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index, while FLGB tracks FTSE UK RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLF and 0.09% for FLGB.

FLGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLF and FLGB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer