XLF vs. DIV
XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) and DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index, while DIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLF returned 13.33%/yr vs 4.30%/yr for DIV. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLF charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
XLF vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a -2.11% return, which is significantly lower than DIV's 14.48% return. Over the past 10 years, XLF has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 13.33%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.
XLF
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- -2.11%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 8.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
DIV
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
XLF vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -2.11% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 14.48% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLF and DIV is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLF and DIV has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLF vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLF
DIV
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XLF
DIV
Technology
XLF
DIV
-
Industrials
XLF
DIV
Basic Materials
XLF
-
DIV
Communication Services
XLF
-
DIV
Consumer Cyclical
XLF
-
DIV
Consumer Defensive
XLF
-
DIV
Energy
XLF
-
DIV
Healthcare
XLF
-
DIV
Real Estate
XLF
-
DIV
Utilities
XLF
-
DIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLF vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
XLF
DIV
XLF vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLF | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.26 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 3.02 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | 8.43 | -7.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLF vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than DIV's maximum drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLF | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.69% | -52.74% | -29.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.79% | -5.23% | -9.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.54% | -12.33% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.81% | -21.14% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.86% | -52.74% | +9.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | -0.73% | -4.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.01% | -7.01% | -13.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.76% | 1.88% | +3.88% |
Volatility
XLF vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.07%. This indicates that XLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLF | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 3.07% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.26% | 7.08% | +4.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.69% | 10.32% | +4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 13.69% | +4.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.17% | 17.98% | +4.19% |
XLF vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLF vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than DIV's 6.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.61% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.49% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLF and DIV have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLF has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to DIV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLF dropped -82.69% vs DIV's -52.74%.
On 10-year performance, XLF leads with 13.33% vs 4.30% for DIV. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLF has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 1.49% for XLF.
XLF is categorized as Financials Equities, while DIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index, while DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLF and 0.45% for DIV.
DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLF and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer