PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLF vs. DIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLF vs. DIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a -2.11% return, which is significantly lower than DIV's 14.48% return. Over the past 10 years, XLF has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 13.33%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.


XLF

1D
1.37%
1M
4.00%
YTD
-2.11%
6M
-2.09%
1Y
8.41%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
13.33%

DIV

1D
0.68%
1M
0.97%
YTD
14.48%
6M
13.33%
1Y
16.51%
3Y*
11.89%
5Y*
5.31%
10Y*
4.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLF vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
-2.11%14.90%30.56%12.03%-10.59%34.80%-1.74%31.88%-13.06%22.00%
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
14.48%3.10%11.27%-1.73%-3.92%30.60%-22.85%14.50%-6.60%9.90%

Correlation

The correlation between XLF and DIV is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between XLF and DIV has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLF vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLF
DIV

Financial Services

98.0%
3.8%

Technology

1.8%

-

Industrials

0.2%
11.7%

Basic Materials

-

4.5%

Communication Services

-

6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

10.7%

Energy

-

23.5%

Healthcare

-

3.5%

Real Estate

-

20.2%

Utilities

-

12.1%

Financial Services

XLF
98.0%
DIV
3.8%

Technology

XLF
1.8%
DIV

-

Industrials

XLF
0.2%
DIV
11.7%

Basic Materials

XLF

-

DIV
4.5%

Communication Services

XLF

-

DIV
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XLF

-

DIV
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

XLF

-

DIV
10.7%

Energy

XLF

-

DIV
23.5%

Healthcare

XLF

-

DIV
3.5%

Real Estate

XLF

-

DIV
20.2%

Utilities

XLF

-

DIV
12.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLF vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLF
XLF Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

DIV
DIV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
DIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLF vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLFDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.26

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

3.02

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

8.43

-7.35

XLF vs. DIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLF Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the DIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLF and DIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLF vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than DIV's maximum drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and DIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLFDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.69%

-52.74%

-29.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.79%

-5.23%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-12.33%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.81%

-21.14%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.86%

-52.74%

+9.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.94%

-0.73%

-4.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.01%

-7.01%

-13.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.76%

1.88%

+3.88%

Volatility

XLF vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison

State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.07%. This indicates that XLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLFDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

3.07%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

7.08%

+4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

10.32%

+4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.66%

13.69%

+4.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.17%

17.98%

+4.19%

XLF vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLF vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison

XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than DIV's 6.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
6.61%7.30%5.74%7.13%6.62%5.24%8.01%7.65%7.08%5.92%6.78%8.44%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.49%1.31%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%21.10%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLF and DIV have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLF has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to DIV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLF dropped -82.69% vs DIV's -52.74%.

On 10-year performance, XLF leads with 13.33% vs 4.30% for DIV. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLF has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.

DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 1.49% for XLF.

XLF is categorized as Financials Equities, while DIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index, while DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLF and 0.45% for DIV.

DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLF and DIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer