PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLE vs. VOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLE vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 29.56% return, which is significantly higher than VOOG's 9.67% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed VOOG with an annualized return of 9.91%, while VOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.86% annualized return.


XLE

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
29.56%
6M
28.37%
1Y
37.19%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
20.12%
10Y*
9.91%

VOOG

1D
0.38%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
9.67%
6M
10.61%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
25.78%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
17.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
29.56%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.67%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and VOOG is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.43

The correlation between XLE and VOOG shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLE vs. VOOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLE
VOOG

Energy

100.0%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.4%

Communication Services

-

18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.0%

Financial Services

-

8.8%

Healthcare

-

5.8%

Industrials

-

6.2%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Technology

-

49.4%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Energy

XLE
100.0%
VOOG
0.1%

Basic Materials

XLE

-

VOOG
0.4%

Communication Services

XLE

-

VOOG
18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XLE

-

VOOG
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

XLE

-

VOOG
1.0%

Financial Services

XLE

-

VOOG
8.8%

Healthcare

XLE

-

VOOG
5.8%

Industrials

XLE

-

VOOG
6.2%

Real Estate

XLE

-

VOOG
0.6%

Technology

XLE

-

VOOG
49.4%

Utilities

XLE

-

VOOG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLE vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLEVOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.02

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.63

8.11

+0.52

XLE vs. VOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and VOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLE vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and VOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLEVOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.26%

-32.73%

-38.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-13.71%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-22.18%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-32.73%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

-32.73%

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.01%

-4.65%

-3.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.97%

-4.97%

-13.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.32%

3.40%

+0.92%

Volatility

XLE vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) at 6.29%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLEVOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.26%

6.29%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.79%

13.43%

+3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.57%

16.60%

+3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.05%

21.29%

+4.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.58%

20.78%

+8.80%

XLE vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLE vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than VOOG's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.45%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.59%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLE and VOOG have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to VOOG (6.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs VOOG's -32.73%.

On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 17.86% vs 9.91% for XLE. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOG has been the lower-risk option at 6.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 17.86% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLE.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.45% for VOOG.

XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while VOOG is S&P 500. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.07% for VOOG.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLE and VOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer