XLE vs. MU
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 9.49%/yr vs 57.08%/yr for MU. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLE vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 25.06% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 281.36% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 9.49%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 57.08% annualized return.
XLE
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 25.06%
- 6M
- 24.78%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.85%
- 5Y*
- 19.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.49%
MU
- 1D
- 10.84%
- 1M
- 50.14%
- YTD
- 281.36%
- 6M
- 358.48%
- 1Y
- 843.42%
- 3Y*
- 153.49%
- 5Y*
- 69.18%
- 10Y*
- 57.08%
XLE vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 25.06% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 281.36% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and MU is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.30 |
The correlation between XLE and MU shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
MU
XLE vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLE | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.82 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 28.14 | -25.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.91 | 106.90 | -99.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLE vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -98.25% | +26.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -30.28% | +18.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -57.63% | +37.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -57.63% | +31.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | -57.63% | -9.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.21% | 0.00% | -11.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -58.16% | +40.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 7.95% | -3.57% |
Volatility
XLE vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) is 8.02%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 33.78%. This indicates that XLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | 33.78% | -25.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.19% | 58.39% | -41.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.86% | 70.48% | -49.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.10% | 53.40% | -27.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.61% | 50.25% | -20.64% |
Dividends
XLE vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.69% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and MU have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (33.78%) compared to XLE (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.11 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer