XLE vs. MCD
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while MCD (McDonald's Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 9.91%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for MCD. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLE vs. MCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 29.56% return, which is significantly higher than MCD's -5.66% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed MCD with an annualized return of 9.91%, while MCD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.46% annualized return.
XLE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 29.56%
- 6M
- 28.37%
- 1Y
- 34.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
MCD
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- -5.66%
- 6M
- -8.96%
- 1Y
- -3.37%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
XLE vs. MCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.56% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
MCD McDonald's Corporation | -5.66% | 7.89% | 0.14% | 15.06% | 0.51% | 27.79% | 11.30% | 13.97% | 5.78% | 45.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and MCD is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.24 |
The correlation between XLE and MCD shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. MCD — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
MCD
XLE vs. MCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and McDonald's Corporation (MCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLE | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.98 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | -0.20 | +3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | -0.50 | +9.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLE vs. MCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, roughly equal to the maximum MCD drawdown of -73.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and MCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -73.20% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -19.05% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -19.05% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -19.05% | -6.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | -36.90% | -29.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -15.46% | +7.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -14.89% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 7.53% | -3.21% |
Volatility
XLE vs. MCD - Volatility Comparison
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to McDonald's Corporation (MCD) at 4.96%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 4.96% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.79% | 12.20% | +4.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.57% | 16.62% | +3.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.05% | 17.27% | +8.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 20.40% | +9.18% |
Dividends
XLE vs. MCD - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, which matches MCD's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCD McDonald's Corporation | 2.58% | 2.35% | 2.34% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.96% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.97% | 2.91% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.59% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and MCD have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to MCD (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs MCD's -73.20%.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and MCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer