XLE vs. EIPX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and EIPX (FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. XLE is passively managed, while EIPX is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XLE returned 17.74%/yr vs 21.58%/yr for EIPX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EIPX.

Performance

XLE vs. EIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 32.26% return, which is significantly higher than EIPX's 22.72% return.

XLE

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -1.18%
• YTD: 32.26%
• 6M: 29.34%
• 1Y: 47.98%
• 3Y*: 17.74%
• 5Y*: 20.45%
• 10Y*: 9.99%

EIPX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -1.66%
• YTD: 22.72%
• 6M: 19.76%
• 1Y: 32.68%
• 3Y*: 21.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. EIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	32.26%	7.88%	5.56%	-0.63%	-2.16%
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	22.72%	11.44%	19.11%	10.74%	0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and EIPX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2022	0.85

The correlation between XLE and EIPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLE vs. EIPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLE	EIPX
Energy	100.0%	69.5%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	4.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	0.2%
Utilities	-	26.1%

Return for Risk

XLE vs. EIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE

XLE Risk / Return Rank: 70
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 64
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 65

EIPX

EIPX Risk / Return Rank: 90
EIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
EIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
EIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
EIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
EIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. EIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLE	EIPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	2.97	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	4.19	-1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.51	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.00	7.97	-3.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.60	22.02	-10.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLE vs. EIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the EIPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and EIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLE	EIPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	2.97	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	1.21	-0.90

Drawdowns

XLE vs. EIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than EIPX's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and EIPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLE	EIPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.26%	-15.43%	-55.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.05%	-4.12%	-7.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.14%	-15.43%	-4.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.09%	-1.98%	-4.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.98%	-2.27%	-15.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.15%	1.49%	+2.66%

Volatility

XLE vs. EIPX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) at 4.07%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLE	EIPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.25%	4.07%	+4.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.51%	8.44%	+8.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.50%	11.14%	+9.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.01%	15.05%	+10.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.58%	15.05%	+14.53%

XLE vs. EIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLE vs. EIPX - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than EIPX's 2.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	2.66%	3.23%	3.27%	3.48%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.54%	3.28%	3.36%	3.55%	3.68%	4.21%	5.62%	6.72%	3.54%	3.03%	2.26%	3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLE and EIPX in my portfolio?

XLE and EIPX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLE or EIPX?

XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to EIPX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs EIPX's -15.43%.

Which ETF is better, XLE or EIPX?

On 3-year performance, EIPX leads with 21.58% vs 17.74% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, EIPX has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLE or EIPX?

Over the 3-year period, EIPX has performed better with a 21.58% return vs 17.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLE or EIPX?

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EIPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLE or EIPX?

EIPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 2.54% for XLE.

What is the main difference between XLE and EIPX?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.95% for EIPX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.