XLE vs. CNSWF

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while CNSWF (Constellation Software Inc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 9.91%/yr vs 18.47%/yr for CNSWF. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XLE vs. CNSWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Constellation Software Inc (CNSWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 29.56% return, which is significantly higher than CNSWF's -12.86% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed CNSWF with an annualized return of 9.91%, while CNSWF has yielded a comparatively higher 18.47% annualized return.

XLE

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: 29.56%
• 6M: 28.37%
• 1Y: 34.84%
• 3Y*: 16.18%
• 5Y*: 20.12%
• 10Y*: 9.91%

CNSWF

• 1D: -4.59%
• 1M: 13.58%
• YTD: -12.86%
• 6M: -12.08%
• 1Y: -41.18%
• 3Y*: 0.56%
• 5Y*: 7.55%
• 10Y*: 18.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. CNSWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	29.56%	7.88%	5.56%	-0.63%	64.32%	53.28%	-32.67%	11.74%	-18.22%	-0.89%
CNSWF Constellation Software Inc	-12.86%	-22.46%	24.90%	59.77%	-15.99%	43.09%	34.48%	53.34%	6.04%	33.51%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and CNSWF is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2007	0.14

The correlation between XLE and CNSWF shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.16 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XLE vs. CNSWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE

XLE Risk / Return Rank: 61
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 54
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 56

CNSWF

CNSWF Risk / Return Rank: 10
CNSWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CNSWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
CNSWF Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CNSWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
CNSWF Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. CNSWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Constellation Software Inc (CNSWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLE	CNSWF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	-1.02	+2.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	-1.48	+3.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	0.83	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	-0.76	+3.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.63	-1.15	+9.79

XLE vs. CNSWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the CNSWF Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and CNSWF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLE vs. CNSWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than CNSWF's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and CNSWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLE	CNSWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.26%	-55.25%	-16.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.05%	-55.12%	+43.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.14%	-55.25%	+35.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.04%	-55.25%	+29.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.81%	-55.25%	-11.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.01%	-43.59%	+35.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.97%	-6.91%	-11.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.32%	36.56%	-32.24%

Volatility

XLE vs. CNSWF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) is 7.26%, while Constellation Software Inc (CNSWF) has a volatility of 13.88%. This indicates that XLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNSWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLE	CNSWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.26%	13.88%	-6.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.79%	34.02%	-17.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.57%	41.50%	-20.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.05%	30.11%	-4.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.58%	28.94%	+0.64%

Dividends

XLE vs. CNSWF - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than CNSWF's 0.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNSWF Constellation Software Inc	0.19%	0.17%	0.13%	0.16%	0.26%	0.22%	0.41%	0.41%	0.63%	0.83%	1.76%	0.96%
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.59%	3.28%	3.36%	3.55%	3.68%	4.21%	5.62%	6.72%	3.54%	3.03%	2.26%	3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLE and CNSWF in my portfolio?

XLE and CNSWF have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLE or CNSWF?

CNSWF has higher volatility (13.88%) compared to XLE (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs CNSWF's -55.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.