CNSWF vs. FIX
CNSWF (Constellation Software Inc) and FIX (Comfort Systems USA, Inc.) are both stocks. CNSWF operates in Software - Application (Technology), while FIX operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CNSWF returned 18.23%/yr vs 51.81%/yr for FIX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CNSWF vs. FIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNSWF achieves a -18.00% return, which is significantly lower than FIX's 104.63% return. Over the past 10 years, CNSWF has underperformed FIX with an annualized return of 18.23%, while FIX has yielded a comparatively higher 51.81% annualized return.
CNSWF
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- -18.00%
- 6M
- -18.95%
- 1Y
- -44.66%
- 3Y*
- -0.53%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- 18.23%
FIX
- 1D
- -7.67%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 104.63%
- 6M
- 97.83%
- 1Y
- 280.20%
- 3Y*
- 128.99%
- 5Y*
- 89.76%
- 10Y*
- 51.81%
CNSWF vs. FIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNSWF Constellation Software Inc | -18.00% | -22.46% | 24.90% | 59.77% | -15.99% | 43.09% | 34.48% | 53.34% | 6.04% | 33.51% |
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 104.63% | 120.86% | 106.89% | 79.62% | 16.98% | 88.98% | 6.73% | 15.07% | 0.73% | 32.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNSWF and FIX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2007 | 0.17 |
The correlation between CNSWF and FIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CNSWF:
$41.68B
FIX:
$67.26B
CNSWF:
$34.82
FIX:
$34.64
CNSWF:
56.48
FIX:
55.08
CNSWF:
2.99
FIX:
0.83
CNSWF:
3.44
FIX:
6.65
CNSWF:
10.70
FIX:
23.89
CNSWF:
$12.11B
FIX:
$10.14B
CNSWF:
$4.15B
FIX:
$2.55B
CNSWF:
$2.77B
FIX:
$1.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNSWF vs. FIX — Risk / Return Rank
CNSWF
FIX
CNSWF vs. FIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Software Inc (CNSWF) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNSWF | FIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.65 | -0.83 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 17.89 | -18.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 59.65 | -60.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNSWF vs. FIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNSWF drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, smaller than the maximum FIX drawdown of -93.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNSWF and FIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNSWF | FIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -93.36% | +38.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.12% | -15.78% | -39.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.25% | -46.05% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.25% | -46.05% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.25% | -49.68% | -5.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.92% | -7.67% | -39.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -38.03% | +31.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.24% | 4.72% | +32.52% |
Volatility
CNSWF vs. FIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Constellation Software Inc (CNSWF) is 14.32%, while Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) has a volatility of 17.05%. This indicates that CNSWF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNSWF | FIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.32% | 17.05% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.39% | 37.85% | -3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.76% | 54.96% | -13.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.19% | 44.84% | -14.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.99% | 42.57% | -13.58% |
Dividends
CNSWF vs. FIX - Dividend Comparison
CNSWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, more than FIX's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNSWF Constellation Software Inc | 0.15% | 0.17% | 0.13% | 0.16% | 0.26% | 0.22% | 0.41% | 0.41% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.76% | 0.96% |
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.28% | 0.41% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 0.81% | 0.79% | 0.76% | 0.68% | 0.83% | 0.88% |
Financials
CNSWF vs. FIX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Software Inc and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CNSWF vs. FIX - Profitability Comparison
CNSWF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc reported a gross profit of 733.69M and revenue of 3.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.
FIX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 754.41M and revenue of 2.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.3%.
CNSWF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc reported an operating income of 452.64M and revenue of 3.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
FIX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported an operating income of 485.72M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.
CNSWF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc reported a net income of 361.92M and revenue of 3.14B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.
FIX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a net income of 370.38M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNSWF and FIX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIX has higher volatility (17.05%) compared to CNSWF (14.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNSWF dropped -55.25% vs FIX's -93.36%.
FIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.14 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNSWF and FIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer