XLE vs. CAIQ
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and CAIQ (Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while CAIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for CAIQ.
Performance
XLE vs. CAIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 25.06% return, which is significantly higher than CAIQ's 12.96% return.
XLE
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 25.06%
- 6M
- 24.78%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.85%
- 5Y*
- 19.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.49%
CAIQ
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLE vs. CAIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 25.06% | 0.34% |
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 12.96% | 4.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and CAIQ is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. CAIQ — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
CAIQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLE vs. CAIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLE | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.91 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLE vs. CAIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than CAIQ's maximum drawdown of -9.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and CAIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -9.06% | -62.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.21% | -0.52% | -10.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -1.70% | -16.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | — | — |
Volatility
XLE vs. CAIQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.86% | 13.91% | +6.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.10% | 13.91% | +12.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.61% | 13.91% | +15.70% |
XLE vs. CAIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CAIQ's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLE vs. CAIQ - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than CAIQ's 8.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 8.50% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.69% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and CAIQ have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAIQ.
CAIQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.50%, compared with 2.69% for XLE.
XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while CAIQ is Nasdaq-100. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while CAIQ tracks MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.74% for CAIQ.
Find the right allocation for XLE and CAIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer