XLC vs. DIA
XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund) and DIA (State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - XLC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, while DIA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLC returned 8.03%/yr vs 10.14%/yr for DIA. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLC charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for DIA.
Performance
XLC vs. DIA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLC achieves a -4.85% return, which is significantly lower than DIA's 7.27% return.
XLC
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- -4.85%
- 6M
- -3.59%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- —
DIA
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 16.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
XLC vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | -4.85% | 23.08% | 34.71% | 52.82% | -37.63% | 15.96% | 26.90% | 31.05% | -16.45% |
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 7.27% | 14.71% | 14.82% | 16.02% | -7.02% | 20.83% | 9.59% | 24.70% | -5.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLC and DIA is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.69 |
The correlation between XLC and DIA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLC vs. DIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLC
DIA
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
XLC
DIA
Technology
XLC
DIA
Basic Materials
XLC
-
DIA
Consumer Cyclical
XLC
-
DIA
Consumer Defensive
XLC
-
DIA
Energy
XLC
-
DIA
Financial Services
XLC
-
DIA
Healthcare
XLC
-
DIA
Industrials
XLC
-
DIA
Real Estate
XLC
-
DIA
-
Utilities
XLC
-
DIA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLC vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank
XLC
DIA
XLC vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLC | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.30 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 2.16 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.73 | 8.35 | -5.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLC vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLC drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, smaller than the maximum DIA drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLC and DIA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLC | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.65% | -51.87% | +5.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.57% | -9.76% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.97% | -15.95% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.65% | -20.76% | -25.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.72% | -0.70% | -6.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.58% | -7.14% | -3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 2.53% | +0.80% |
Volatility
XLC vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) is 3.57%, while State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that XLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLC | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 4.32% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 9.78% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.28% | 12.52% | +0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 14.85% | +5.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.17% | 17.56% | +4.61% |
XLC vs. DIA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLC has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than DIA's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLC vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison
XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than DIA's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 1.37% | 1.43% | 1.61% | 1.81% | 1.91% | 1.58% | 1.87% | 1.85% | 2.24% | 1.97% | 2.26% | 2.33% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.25% | 1.13% | 0.99% | 0.82% | 1.10% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.82% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLC and DIA have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIA has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to XLC (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLC dropped -46.65% vs DIA's -51.87%.
On 5-year performance, DIA leads with 10.14% vs 8.03% for XLC. On fees, XLC is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIA has performed better with a 10.14% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLC is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for DIA.
DIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.25% for XLC.
XLC is categorized as Communications Equities, while DIA is Large Cap Blend Equities. XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, while DIA tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLC and 0.16% for DIA.
DIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLC and DIA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer