XLBP.L vs. XUIN.L
XLBP.L (Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF) and XUIN.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D) are both Industrials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, from Invesco and DWS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLBP.L returned 6.07%/yr vs 13.65%/yr for XUIN.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLBP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XUIN.L.
Performance
XLBP.L vs. XUIN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLBP.L is traded in GBp, while XUIN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUIN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLBP.L achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly lower than XUIN.L's 14.05% return.
XLBP.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 12.87%
- 6M
- 15.98%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
XUIN.L
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 14.05%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- 1Y
- 24.54%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- 13.65%
- 10Y*
- —
XLBP.L vs. XUIN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLBP.L Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF | 12.87% | 3.47% | 0.77% | 6.09% | -1.67% | 29.20% |
XUIN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D | 14.01% | 9.77% | 19.17% | 14.89% | 4.22% | 22.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLBP.L and XUIN.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.70 |
The correlation between XLBP.L and XUIN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLBP.L vs. XUIN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLBP.L
XUIN.L
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
XLBP.L
XUIN.L
Consumer Cyclical
XLBP.L
XUIN.L
Industrials
XLBP.L
XUIN.L
Communication Services
XLBP.L
-
XUIN.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XLBP.L
-
XUIN.L
-
Energy
XLBP.L
-
XUIN.L
-
Financial Services
XLBP.L
-
XUIN.L
Healthcare
XLBP.L
-
XUIN.L
-
Real Estate
XLBP.L
-
XUIN.L
-
Technology
XLBP.L
-
XUIN.L
Utilities
XLBP.L
-
XUIN.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLBP.L vs. XUIN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLBP.L
XUIN.L
XLBP.L vs. XUIN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D (XUIN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLBP.L | XUIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.28 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 2.66 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.29 | 8.42 | -2.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLBP.L | XUIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.65 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.80 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.93 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
XLBP.L vs. XUIN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLBP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, which is greater than XUIN.L's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLBP.L and XUIN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLBP.L | XUIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.58% | -20.86% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -9.19% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.98% | -20.86% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | -20.86% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -0.49% | -2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -3.54% | -1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 2.91% | +0.27% |
Volatility
XLBP.L vs. XUIN.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D (XUIN.L) have volatilities of 5.17% and 5.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLBP.L | XUIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 5.24% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 11.74% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.85% | 14.81% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 16.98% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 17.01% | +1.19% |
XLBP.L vs. XUIN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLBP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than XUIN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLBP.L vs. XUIN.L - Dividend Comparison
XLBP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUIN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLBP.L Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUIN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Industrials UCITS ETF 1D | 0.91% | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.17% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLBP.L and XUIN.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUIN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUIN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLBP.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLBP.L and 0.12% for XUIN.L.
Find the right allocation for XLBP.L and XUIN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer