XLBP.L vs. XDWI.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XLBP.L (Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF) and XDWI.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C) are both Industrials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, from Invesco and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLBP.L returned 10.67%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for XDWI.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLBP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWI.L.

Performance

XLBP.L vs. XDWI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XLBP.L is traded in GBp, while XDWI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDWI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLBP.L achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly higher than XDWI.L's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, XLBP.L has underperformed XDWI.L with an annualized return of 10.67%, while XDWI.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.16% annualized return.

XLBP.L

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: 12.87%
• 6M: 15.98%
• 1Y: 20.07%
• 3Y*: 8.27%
• 5Y*: 6.07%
• 10Y*: 10.67%

XDWI.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: 11.69%
• 6M: 12.17%
• 1Y: 23.05%
• 3Y*: 18.44%
• 5Y*: 12.66%
• 10Y*: 13.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLBP.L vs. XDWI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLBP.L Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF	12.87%	3.47%	0.77%	6.09%	-1.67%	28.80%	15.99%	19.70%	-9.97%	12.17%
XDWI.L Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C	11.66%	16.57%	15.04%	17.16%	-2.34%	17.19%	8.57%	22.33%	-9.78%	14.52%

Correlation

The correlation between XLBP.L and XDWI.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2016	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between XLBP.L and XDWI.L has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLBP.L vs. XDWI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLBP.L	XDWI.L
Basic Materials	89.8%	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	0.3%
Industrials	1.6%	95.1%
Communication Services	-	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.1%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.3%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Technology	-	3.5%
Utilities	-	2.8%

Return for Risk

XLBP.L vs. XDWI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLBP.L

XLBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 38
XLBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
XLBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
XLBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 36
XLBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
XLBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 40

XDWI.L

XDWI.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
XDWI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
XDWI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
XDWI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 40
XDWI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
XDWI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLBP.L vs. XDWI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLBP.L	XDWI.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.52	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	2.20	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.28	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	2.40	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.29	8.34	-2.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLBP.L vs. XDWI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLBP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the XDWI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLBP.L and XDWI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLBP.L	XDWI.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	1.52	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.80	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.77	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.77	-0.21

Drawdowns

XLBP.L vs. XDWI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLBP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, smaller than the maximum XDWI.L drawdown of -31.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLBP.L and XDWI.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLBP.L	XDWI.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.58%	-31.39%	+2.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.74%	-9.58%	-1.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.98%	-17.22%	-4.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.98%	-17.22%	-4.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.58%	-31.39%	+2.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.23%	-1.47%	-1.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.53%	-3.88%	-1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	2.76%	+0.42%

Volatility

XLBP.L vs. XDWI.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) have volatilities of 5.17% and 5.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLBP.L	XDWI.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	5.18%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.95%	12.65%	-0.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.85%	15.07%	-0.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.38%	15.78%	+0.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.20%	17.08%	+1.12%

XLBP.L vs. XDWI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLBP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWI.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLBP.L vs. XDWI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLBP.L nor XDWI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLBP.L and XDWI.L in my portfolio?

XLBP.L and XDWI.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLBP.L or XDWI.L?

On fees, XLBP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLBP.L or XDWI.L?

XLBP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWI.L.

What is the main difference between XLBP.L and XDWI.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLBP.L and 0.25% for XDWI.L.